Pradeep Dadu Gophane vs M/s. Suresh Indu Lasers Pvt Ltd Advocate - A.D. Patwardhan — 255/2023
Case under Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 Section 2. Status: Evidence of Second Party. Next hearing: 09th April 2026.
Reference IDA - Reference
CNR: MHLC120006722023
Next Hearing
09th April 2026
Filing Number
672/2023
Filing Date
30-11-2023
Registration No
255/2023
Registration Date
06-12-2023
Court
Labour Court, Pune.
Judge
1-Judge, 1st Labour Court, Pune.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Pradeep Dadu Gophane
Adv. D. B. Sharmale
Respondent(s)
M/s. Suresh Indu Lasers Pvt Ltd Advocate - A.D. Patwardhan
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judge, 1st Labour Court, Pune.
Evidence of Second Party
Cross of First Party
Evidence of Opponent
Evidence of Opponent
Evidence of Opponent
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Evidence of Second Party |
| 10-02-2026 | Cross of First Party |
| 15-01-2026 | Evidence of Opponent |
| 26-11-2025 | Evidence of Opponent |
| 10-10-2025 | Evidence of Opponent |
Interim Orders
This is a record of witness examination in a labour dispute case (REF. IDA NO. 255/2023) before the Second Labour Court, Pune, dated 06/03/2026. The witness (Shri. Dilip Kumar Solanki) provided evidence for the respondent company regarding closure of the Handewadi Unit and subsequent termination of employees, followed by cross-examination by the applicant's advocate that challenged the legitimacy of the charges and suggested potential union-related retaliation. The cross-examination has been completed, and no final order/judgment has been issued in this excerpt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is a record of witness examination in a labour dispute case (REF. IDA NO. 255/2023) before the Second Labour Court, Pune, dated 06/03/2026. The witness (Shri. Dilip Kumar Solanki) provided evidence for the respondent company regarding closure of the Handewadi Unit and subsequent termination of employees, followed by cross-examination by the applicant's advocate that challenged the legitimacy of the charges and suggested potential union-related retaliation. The cross-examination has been completed, and no final order/judgment has been issued in this excerpt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts