Seco Tools India Pvt. Ltd vs Navanath Bhagchandra Phargade Advocate - N. A. Kolhatkar — 18/2020
Case under Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 Section 2A. Status: Further Evi. of Second Party. Next hearing: 02nd April 2026.
Reference IDA - Reference
CNR: MHLC120001792020
Next Hearing
02nd April 2026
Filing Number
179/2020
Filing Date
08-01-2020
Registration No
18/2020
Registration Date
09-03-2020
Court
Labour Court, Pune.
Judge
1-Judge, 1st Labour Court, Pune.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Seco Tools India Pvt. Ltd
Adv. A. R. Joshi
Respondent(s)
Navanath Bhagchandra Phargade Advocate - N. A. Kolhatkar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judge, 1st Labour Court, Pune.
Further Evi. of Second Party
Cross of Second Party
Cross of Second Party
Cross of Second Party
Cross of Second Party
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Further Evi. of Second Party |
| 05-02-2026 | Cross of Second Party |
| 08-01-2026 | Cross of Second Party |
| 17-12-2025 | Cross of Second Party |
| 20-11-2025 | Cross of Second Party |
Interim Orders
Summary: In IDA No. 18 of 2020 before the Second Labour Court, Pune, the cross-examination of second party Shri Navnath Bhagchandra Fargade in an employment dispute was adjourned on 20/11/2025 at the oral request of the first party's advocate. The second party, who claims dismissal was improper due to his disability, provided testimony regarding his disability certificate, employment applications, and post-termination livelihood through agricultural cultivation, while disputing allegations of poor performance and denying he lacks work capacity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In IDA No. 18 of 2020 before the Second Labour Court, Pune, the cross-examination of second party Shri Navnath Bhagchandra Fargade in an employment dispute was adjourned on 20/11/2025 at the oral request of the first party's advocate. The second party, who claims dismissal was improper due to his disability, provided testimony regarding his disability certificate, employment applications, and post-termination livelihood through agricultural cultivation, while disputing allegations of poor performance and denying he lacks work capacity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts