Kasuti Foundry Pvt. Ltd vs Nihal Najim Sayyad — 17/2024
Case under Workmen Compensation Act, 1923 Section 8. Status: Amendement. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.
Appln. ECA A - Application ECA A
CNR: MHLC100004632024
Next Hearing
27th March 2026
Filing Number
5000498/2024
Filing Date
30-12-2024
Registration No
17/2024
Registration Date
30-12-2024
Court
Labour Court,Sangli
Judge
1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT, SANGLI
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kasuti Foundry Pvt. Ltd
Adv. Amey T Vaze
Go Digit General Insurance Limited
Respondent(s)
Nihal Najim Sayyad
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT, SANGLI
Amendement
Amendement
Amendement
Amendement
Amendement
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Amendement |
| 20-02-2026 | Amendement |
| 10-02-2026 | Amendement |
| 09-01-2026 | Amendement |
| 19-12-2025 | Amendement |
Interim Orders
Summary: The Labour Court at Sangli allowed an application (E.C. No. 48/A-17/2024) filed by Kasturi Foundry Pvt. Ltd. to implead Godrej General Insurance Company as a necessary party in a workers' compensation case. The court found that the injured worker (Ninahal Najeem Sayyad) sustained 50% disability on 18.09.2024, entitling him to compensation of Rs. 9,83,115/-. Since the employer had insured all workers under a Godrej General Insurance policy, the insurance company was added as a party to bear the compensation liability, and the employer was directed to file its proposed amendments within the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Labour Court at Sangli allowed an application (E.C. No. 48/A-17/2024) filed by Kasturi Foundry Pvt. Ltd. to implead Godrej General Insurance Company as a necessary party in a workers' compensation case. The court found that the injured worker (Ninahal Najeem Sayyad) sustained 50% disability on 18.09.2024, entitling him to compensation of Rs. 9,83,115/-. Since the employer had insured all workers under a Godrej General Insurance policy, the insurance company was added as a party to bear the compensation liability, and the employer was directed to file its proposed amendments within the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts