Kasuti Foundry Pvt. Ltd vs Nihal Najim Sayyad — 17/2024

Case under Workmen Compensation Act, 1923 Section 8. Status: Amendement. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.

Appln. ECA A - Application ECA A

CNR: MHLC100004632024

Amendement

Next Hearing

27th March 2026

Filing Number

5000498/2024

Filing Date

30-12-2024

Registration No

17/2024

Registration Date

30-12-2024

Court

Labour Court,Sangli

Judge

1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT, SANGLI

Acts & Sections

Workmen Compensation Act, 1923 Section 8

Petitioner(s)

Kasuti Foundry Pvt. Ltd

Adv. Amey T Vaze

Go Digit General Insurance Limited

Respondent(s)

Nihal Najim Sayyad

Hearing History

Judge: 1-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT, SANGLI

06-03-2026

Amendement

20-02-2026

Amendement

10-02-2026

Amendement

09-01-2026

Amendement

19-12-2025

Amendement

Interim Orders

09-09-2025
Order Below Exb.

Summary: The Labour Court at Sangli allowed an application (E.C. No. 48/A-17/2024) filed by Kasturi Foundry Pvt. Ltd. to implead Godrej General Insurance Company as a necessary party in a workers' compensation case. The court found that the injured worker (Ninahal Najeem Sayyad) sustained 50% disability on 18.09.2024, entitling him to compensation of Rs. 9,83,115/-. Since the employer had insured all workers under a Godrej General Insurance policy, the insurance company was added as a party to bear the compensation liability, and the employer was directed to file its proposed amendments within the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Labour Court at Sangli allowed an application (E.C. No. 48/A-17/2024) filed by Kasturi Foundry Pvt. Ltd. to implead Godrej General Insurance Company as a necessary party in a workers' compensation case. The court found that the injured worker (Ninahal Najeem Sayyad) sustained 50% disability on 18.09.2024, entitling him to compensation of Rs. 9,83,115/-. Since the employer had insured all workers under a Godrej General Insurance policy, the insurance company was added as a party to bear the compensation liability, and the employer was directed to file its proposed amendments within the next hearing date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Labour Court,Sangli All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case