Yashodadevi Arun Chougule vs Shree Kedar Metal Foundries Through H.R. Manager — 22/2025
Case under Workmen Compensation Act, 1923 Section 22. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 14th March 2026.
Appln. ECA B - Application ECA B
CNR: MHLC100002092025
Filing Number
252/2025
Filing Date
03-Oct-2025
Registration No
22/2025
Registration Date
03-Oct-2025
Court
Labour Court,Sangli
Judge
1-Judge, Labour Court, Sangli
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOKADALAT
Last updated 26-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Yashodadevi Arun Chougule
Adv. Adv. Rajaram Krushana Yamgar
Respondent(s)
-
1.Shree Kedar Metal Foundries Through H.R. Manager
-
2.Shri. Ram General Insurance Co Ltd
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
AwardView PDF
The document appears to be a Hindi/Marathi judicial order from a District and Session Court regarding a public interest litigation (PIL) dated 3/2028. However, the image quality is significantly degraded with heavy handwriting, stamps, and overlapping marks that make the specific substantive content largely illegible. While the document structure and signatures are visible, the critical decision and reasoning cannot be reliably read. SKIP This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judge, Labour Court, Sangli
-
11-Mar-2026
Say
Judge, Labour Court, Sangli
-
06-Mar-2026
Say
Judge, Labour Court, Sangli
-
02-Mar-2026
Say
Judge, Labour Court, Sangli
-
24-Feb-2026
Evidence
Judge, Labour Court, Sangli
-
16-Feb-2026
Evidence
Judge, Labour Court, Sangli
-
04-Feb-2026
Say
Judge, Labour Court, Sangli
-
29-Jan-2026
Say
Judge, Labour Court, Sangli
-
05-Jan-2026
Say
Judge, Labour Court, Sangli
-
17-Dec-2025
Order Below Ex.U-1
Judge, Labour Court, Sangli
-
03-Dec-2025
Say
Judge, Labour Court, Sangli
-
20-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 22/2025
The document appears to be a Hindi/Marathi judicial order from a District and Session Court regarding a public interest litigation (PIL) dated 3/2028. However, the image quality is significantly degraded with heavy handwriting, stamps, and overlapping marks that make the specific substantive content largely illegible. While the document structure and signatures are visible, the critical decision and reasoning cannot be reliably read. SKIP This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts