Ajit Vilas Patil vs M .S. R. T. C Kolhapur Advocate - V. S. Chavan — 94/2019
Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 Section 28(1). Status: Cross Examination. Next hearing: 30th March 2026.
Comp. ULP - Complaint
CNR: MHLC090004252019
Next Hearing
30th March 2026
Filing Number
423/2019
Filing Date
23-12-2019
Registration No
94/2019
Registration Date
23-12-2019
Court
Labour Court, Kolhapur
Judge
2-Judge, Labour Court No. 2 Kolhapur.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ajit Vilas Patil
Adv. S. M. Gaikwad
Respondent(s)
M .S. R. T. C Kolhapur Advocate - V. S. Chavan
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Judge, Labour Court No. 2 Kolhapur.
Cross Examination
Cross Examination
Cross Examination
Cross Examination
Cross Examination
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Cross Examination |
| 06-03-2026 | Cross Examination |
| 21-02-2026 | Cross Examination |
| 13-02-2026 | Cross Examination |
| 30-01-2026 | Cross Examination |
Interim Orders
Summary The Labour Court dismissed the unfair labour practices complaint filed by Ajit Vilas Patil, a bus driver with MSRTC. The court upheld the inquiry that found him guilty of rash and negligent driving causing a fatal accident on 09/10/2017, ruling that the departmental inquiry was legally conducted in accordance with natural justice principles and the inquiry officer's findings were based on sufficient evidence and not perverse. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Labour Court dismissed the unfair labour practices complaint filed by Ajit Vilas Patil, a bus driver with MSRTC. The court upheld the inquiry that found him guilty of rash and negligent driving causing a fatal accident on 09/10/2017, ruling that the departmental inquiry was legally conducted in accordance with natural justice principles and the inquiry officer's findings were based on sufficient evidence and not perverse. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts