Baliram Maruti Patil vs Tessitura Monti India Pvt.Ltd. Advocate - D. S. Joshi — 33/2024
Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 Section 28. Status: Say. Next hearing: 30th March 2026.
Comp. ULP - Complaint
CNR: MHLC090003042024
Next Hearing
30th March 2026
Filing Number
316/2024
Filing Date
03-09-2024
Registration No
33/2024
Registration Date
04-09-2024
Court
Labour Court, Kolhapur
Judge
2-Judge, Labour Court No. 2 Kolhapur.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Baliram Maruti Patil
Adv. A. D. Patil
Respondent(s)
Tessitura Monti India Pvt.Ltd. Advocate - D. S. Joshi
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Judge, Labour Court No. 2 Kolhapur.
Say
Order below Exh...
Hearing Below Exh...
Say
Say
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Say |
| 06-03-2026 | Order below Exh... |
| 27-02-2026 | Hearing Below Exh... |
| 06-02-2026 | Say |
| 28-01-2026 | Say |
Interim Orders
Summary: The Labour Court at Kolhapur allowed the complainant's application to amend the unfair labour practice complaint regarding his illegal termination dated 20/08/2024. The court found that the proposed amendments, including allegations regarding protected workman status and pending Industrial Court Reference No. 09/2021, constitute additional pleadings that do not change the fundamental nature of the complaint and are necessary to avoid multiplicity of litigation. The complainant is directed to carry out the amendments on or before the next date of hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Labour Court at Kolhapur allowed the complainant's application to amend the unfair labour practice complaint regarding his illegal termination dated 20/08/2024. The court found that the proposed amendments, including allegations regarding protected workman status and pending Industrial Court Reference No. 09/2021, constitute additional pleadings that do not change the fundamental nature of the complaint and are necessary to avoid multiplicity of litigation. The complainant is directed to carry out the amendments on or before the next date of hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts