Sandeep Dhondiram Patre vs Tessitura Monti India Pvt.Ltd. Advocate - D. S. Joshi — 30/2024

Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 Section 28. Status: Say. Next hearing: 30th March 2026.

Comp. ULP - Complaint

CNR: MHLC090003012024

Say

Next Hearing

30th March 2026

Filing Number

313/2024

Filing Date

03-09-2024

Registration No

30/2024

Registration Date

04-09-2024

Court

Labour Court, Kolhapur

Judge

2-Judge, Labour Court No. 2 Kolhapur.

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 Section 28

Petitioner(s)

Sandeep Dhondiram Patre

Adv. A. D. Patil

Respondent(s)

Tessitura Monti India Pvt.Ltd. Advocate - D. S. Joshi

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Judge, Labour Court No. 2 Kolhapur.

12-03-2026

Say

06-03-2026

Order below Exh...

27-02-2026

Hearing Below Exh...

06-02-2026

Say

28-01-2026

Say

Interim Orders

12-03-2026
Order below Exh.

Summary: The Labour Court at Kolhapur allowed the complainant's application to amend the unfair labour practice (ULP) complaint challenging an illegal termination order dated 20/08/2024. The court found that the proposed amendments—including allegations regarding the complainant's protected workman status and the pending Industrial Court Reference No. 09/2021—constitute mere additional pleadings without changing the core nature of the complaint. The complainant was directed to carry out the amendments on or before the next date of hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Labour Court at Kolhapur allowed the complainant's application to amend the unfair labour practice (ULP) complaint challenging an illegal termination order dated 20/08/2024. The court found that the proposed amendments—including allegations regarding the complainant's protected workman status and the pending Industrial Court Reference No. 09/2021—constitute mere additional pleadings without changing the core nature of the complaint. The complainant was directed to carry out the amendments on or before the next date of hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Labour Court, Kolhapur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case