Pravin Ranjitrao Desai vs Kolhapur Zilla Shakari Dudh Utpadak Sangh Ltd., Kolhapur Advocate - D. S. Desai — 21/2024
Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 Section 28. Status: Judgment. Next hearing: 01st April 2026.
Comp. ULP - Complaint
CNR: MHLC090002272024
Next Hearing
01st April 2026
Filing Number
237/2024
Filing Date
22-06-2024
Registration No
21/2024
Registration Date
28-06-2024
Court
Labour Court, Kolhapur
Judge
2-Judge, Labour Court No. 2 Kolhapur.
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Pravin Ranjitrao Desai
Adv. B. D. Manolkar
Respondent(s)
Kolhapur Zilla Shakari Dudh Utpadak Sangh Ltd., Kolhapur Advocate - D. S. Desai
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Judge, Labour Court No. 2 Kolhapur.
Judgment
Argument
Further Evidence of Applicant/Complainant
Cross Examination
Cross Examination
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Judgment |
| 11-03-2026 | Argument |
| 06-03-2026 | Further Evidence of Applicant/Complainant |
| 25-02-2026 | Cross Examination |
| 11-02-2026 | Cross Examination |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY This is a Labor Court order (Case No. 21/2024) from Kolhapur, Maharashtra in Hindi and Marathi languages. The petition filed by an Assistant Marketing Officer was DISMISSED. The court rejected the applicant's claims regarding wrongful transfer from the Marketing Department, wage disputes, and alleged discrepancies in bills and accounts. The court found the applicant's allegations unsubstantiated and ruled against granting the requested relief regarding reinstatement, back wages of ₹36,00,000, and other benefits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY This is a Labor Court order (Case No. 21/2024) from Kolhapur, Maharashtra in Hindi and Marathi languages. The petition filed by an Assistant Marketing Officer was DISMISSED. The court rejected the applicant's claims regarding wrongful transfer from the Marketing Department, wage disputes, and alleged discrepancies in bills and accounts. The court found the applicant's allegations unsubstantiated and ruled against granting the requested relief regarding reinstatement, back wages of ₹36,00,000, and other benefits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts