Sanjay Pandurang Ghorpade vs Indo Count Industries Ltd., Advocate - D. S. Joshi — 9/2024

Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 Section 28. Status: Say. Next hearing: 24th April 2026.

Comp. ULP - Complaint

CNR: MHLC090001282024

Say

Next Hearing

24th April 2026

Filing Number

134/2024

Filing Date

27-03-2024

Registration No

9/2024

Registration Date

27-03-2024

Court

Labour Court, Kolhapur

Judge

2-Judge, Labour Court No. 2 Kolhapur.

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 Section 28

Petitioner(s)

Sanjay Pandurang Ghorpade

Adv. R. D. Patil

Respondent(s)

Indo Count Industries Ltd., Advocate - D. S. Joshi

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Judge, Labour Court No. 2 Kolhapur.

25-03-2026

Say

13-03-2026

Say

06-03-2026

Evidence

10-02-2026

Evidence

02-02-2026

Evidence

Interim Orders

03-04-2024
Order below Exh.

Court Order Summary Interim relief petition ALLOWED. The Second Labour Court at Kolhapur restrained Indo Count Industries Ltd. from terminating the complainant's (Sanjay Pandurang Ghorpade's) service until he attains age 60, finding prima-facie evidence of unfair labour practices under the MRTU & PULP Act, 1971. The court held that Model Standing Orders prescribe retirement at age 60, not 58 as the company practices, and the complainant demonstrated irreparable loss without interim protection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Order Summary Interim relief petition ALLOWED. The Second Labour Court at Kolhapur restrained Indo Count Industries Ltd. from terminating the complainant's (Sanjay Pandurang Ghorpade's) service until he attains age 60, finding prima-facie evidence of unfair labour practices under the MRTU & PULP Act, 1971. The court held that Model Standing Orders prescribe retirement at age 60, not 58 as the company practices, and the complainant demonstrated irreparable loss without interim protection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Labour Court, Kolhapur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case