Bhimrao Maruti Tadakhe vs Managing Director Shri Tatyasaheb Kore Warna S S K Ltd., Advocate - D. S. Joshi — 7/2024

Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 Section 28. Status: Respondent Evidence. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.

Respondent Evidence Next hearing 27-Mar-2026 this date has passed

Comp. ULP - Complaint

CNR: MHLC090001212024

Filing Number

125/2024

Filing Date

18-Mar-2024

Registration No

7/2024

Registration Date

18-Mar-2024

Court

Labour Court, Kolhapur

Judge

2-Judge, Labour Court No. 2 Kolhapur.

Last updated 26-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 Section 28

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Bhimrao Maruti Tadakhe

    Adv. P. R. Rane

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Managing Director Shri Tatyasaheb Kore Warna S S K Ltd., Advocate - D. S. Joshi

  2. 2.Shri Tatyasaheb Kore Warna S S K Ltd.,

Case History

  1. 27-Mar-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Respondent Evidence

    Judge, Labour Court No. 2 Kolhapur.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Respondent Evidence

    Judge, Labour Court No. 2 Kolhapur.

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Respondent Evidence

    Judge, Labour Court No. 2 Kolhapur.

  5. 20-Feb-2026

    Respondent Evidence

    Judge, Labour Court No. 2 Kolhapur.

  6. 30-Jan-2026

    EvidenceView PDF

    SUMMARY: The petition is dismissed in full. The petitioner's claims regarding injury compensation, medical reimbursement of Rs. 22,491, and other employment-related grievances against the workplace were rejected due to insufficient evidence and lack of proper documentation. The court found that the petitioner failed to provide medical certificates, could not substantiate claims through the employer, and did not produce required legal documentation to support the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  7. 30-Jan-2026

    Respondent Evidence

    Judge, Labour Court No. 2 Kolhapur.

  8. 16-Jan-2026

    Cross Examination

    Judge, Labour Court No. 2 Kolhapur.

  9. 26-Dec-2025

    Cross Examination

    Judge, Labour Court No. 2 Kolhapur.

  10. 10-Dec-2025

    Cross Examination

    Judge, Labour Court No. 2 Kolhapur.

  11. 06-Dec-2025

    Cross Examination

    Judge, Labour Court No. 2 Kolhapur.

  12. 12-Nov-2025

    Cross Examination

    Judge, Labour Court No. 2 Kolhapur.

  13. 15-Oct-2025

    Cross Examination

    Judge, Labour Court No. 2 Kolhapur.

  14. 10-Sep-2025

    Cross Examination

    Judge, Labour Court No. 2 Kolhapur.

  15. 18-Aug-2025

    Cross Examination

    Judge, Labour Court No. 2 Kolhapur.

  16. 28-Jul-2025

    Cross Examination

    Judge, Labour Court No. 2 Kolhapur.

  17. 09-Jul-2025

    Cross Examination

    Judge, Labour Court No. 2 Kolhapur.

  18. 09-May-2025

    Cross Examination

    Judge, Labour Court No. 2 Kolhapur.

  19. 28-Apr-2025

    Cross Examination

    Judge, Labour Court No. 2 Kolhapur.

  20. 29-Mar-2025

    Cross Examination

    Judge, Labour Court No. 2 Kolhapur.

  21. 05-Mar-2025

    Cross Examination

    Judge, Labour Court No. 2 Kolhapur.

  22. 15-Feb-2025

    Cross Examination

    Judge, Labour Court No. 2 Kolhapur.

  23. 29-Jan-2025

    Cross Examination

    Judge, Labour Court No. 2 Kolhapur.

  24. 06-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Judge, Labour Court No. 2 Kolhapur.

  25. 11-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Judge, Labour Court No. 2 Kolhapur.

  26. 16-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Judge, Labour Court No. 2 Kolhapur.

  27. 25-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Judge, Labour Court No. 2 Kolhapur.

  28. 09-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Judge, Labour Court No. 2 Kolhapur.

  29. 19-Jul-2024

    Documents Issues

    Judge, Labour Court No. 2 Kolhapur.

  30. 29-Jun-2024

    Service Report

    Judge, Labour Court No. 2 Kolhapur.

  31. 10-May-2024

    Service Report

    Judge, Labour Court No. 2 Kolhapur.

  32. 24-Apr-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  33. 18-Mar-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 7/2024

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: The petition is dismissed in full. The petitioner's claims regarding injury compensation, medical reimbursement of Rs. 22,491, and other employment-related grievances against the workplace were rejected due to insufficient evidence and lack of proper documentation. The court found that the petitioner failed to provide medical certificates, could not substantiate claims through the employer, and did not produce required legal documentation to support the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case