M/s. Sona Textiles vs Dagadu Ramchandra Patil Advocate - R.S.Nikam U.R. — 11/2023
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 12. Status: Second Party Evidence. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.
Ref-IDA - Reference
CNR: MHLC090000592023
Filing Number
61/2023
Filing Date
10-Feb-2023
Registration No
11/2023
Registration Date
10-Feb-2023
Court
Labour Court, Kolhapur
Judge
2-Judge, Labour Court No. 2 Kolhapur.
Last updated 26-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M/s. Sona Textiles
Adv. V. S. Chavan
Respondent(s)
-
1.Dagadu Ramchandra Patil Advocate - R.S.Nikam U.R.
Case History
-
27-Mar-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
Second Party Evidence
Judge, Labour Court No. 2 Kolhapur.
-
05-Feb-2026
Evidence
Judge, Labour Court No. 2 Kolhapur.
-
03-Jan-2026
Evidence
Judge, Labour Court No. 2 Kolhapur.
-
05-Dec-2025
Evidence
Judge, Labour Court No. 2 Kolhapur.
-
16-Oct-2025
Evidence
Judge, Labour Court No. 2 Kolhapur.
-
11-Sep-2025
Evidence
Judge, Labour Court No. 2 Kolhapur.
-
14-Aug-2025
Evidence
Judge, Labour Court No. 2 Kolhapur.
-
19-Jun-2025
Evidence
Judge, Labour Court No. 2 Kolhapur.
-
25-Apr-2025
Evidence
Judge, Labour Court No. 2 Kolhapur.
-
07-Mar-2025
Evidence
Judge, Labour Court No. 2 Kolhapur.
-
20-Jan-2025
Evidence
Judge, Labour Court No. 2 Kolhapur.
-
29-Nov-2024
Evidence
Judge, Labour Court No. 2 Kolhapur.
-
11-Oct-2024
Evidence
Judge, Labour Court No. 2 Kolhapur.
-
23-Aug-2024
Evidence
Judge, Labour Court No. 2 Kolhapur.
-
01-Jul-2024
Evidence
Judge, Labour Court No. 2 Kolhapur.
-
18-Apr-2024
Evidence
Judge, Labour Court No. 2 Kolhapur.
-
22-Mar-2024
Documents Issues
Judge, Labour Court No. 2 Kolhapur.
-
23-Feb-2024
Written Statement
Judge, Labour Court No. 2 Kolhapur.
-
25-Jan-2024
Written Statement
Judge, Labour Court No. 2 Kolhapur.
-
07-Dec-2023
Order below Exh.View PDF
Summary: The application filed by the employer seeking directions for the employee to resume duties has been rejected. The Second Labour Court, Kolhapur found the application not maintainable at that stage, as allowing it would amount to final adjudication of the pending reference without proper hearing on the merits of the oral termination dispute. The employee's apprehension about personal safety and life threats, which were not part of the original claim, indicated unwillingness to resume work. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Dec-2023
Written Statement
Judge, Labour Court No. 2 Kolhapur.
-
23-Nov-2023
Order below Exh...
Judge, Labour Court No. 2 Kolhapur.
-
26-Oct-2023
Hearing Below Exh...
Judge, Labour Court No. 2 Kolhapur.
-
29-Sep-2023
Say
Judge, Labour Court No. 2 Kolhapur.
-
23-Aug-2023
Say
Judge, Labour Court No. 2 Kolhapur.
-
20-Jul-2023
Written Statement
Judge, Labour Court No. 2 Kolhapur.
-
22-Jun-2023
Written Statement
Judge, Labour Court No. 2 Kolhapur.
-
06-Jun-2023
Written Statement
Judge, Labour Court No. 2 Kolhapur.
-
28-Mar-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Feb-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 11/2023
Summary: The application filed by the employer seeking directions for the employee to resume duties has been rejected. The Second Labour Court, Kolhapur found the application not maintainable at that stage, as allowing it would amount to final adjudication of the pending reference without proper hearing on the merits of the oral termination dispute. The employee's apprehension about personal safety and life threats, which were not part of the original claim, indicated unwillingness to resume work. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts