Sidharth Vilas Kamble vs Divisional Forest Officer and Ors-2 Advocate - A. A. Mahadeshwar — 4/2025
Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 Section 28(1). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT on 06th March 2026.
Condn of Delay ULP - Delay application
CNR: MHLC090000412025
Filing Number
44/2025
Filing Date
18-01-2025
Registration No
4/2025
Registration Date
20-01-2025
Court
Labour Court, Kolhapur
Judge
1-Judge, Labour Court No. 1 Kolhapur.
Decision Date
06th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sidharth Vilas Kamble
Adv. B. B. Powar
Respondent(s)
Divisional Forest Officer and Ors-2 Advocate - A. A. Mahadeshwar
Forestry Inspector Social Forestry Zone
Government of Maharashtra
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judge, Labour Court No. 1 Kolhapur.
Disposed
Judgment
Argument
Respondent Evidence
Respondent Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 02-03-2026 | Judgment |
| 12-02-2026 | Argument |
| 20-01-2026 | Respondent Evidence |
| 06-01-2026 | Respondent Evidence |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The Labour Court at Kolhapur allowed an application for condonation of delay filed by an unemployed forest worker seeking to challenge his oral termination from August 2022. The court found sufficient justification for the 2-year 2-month delay in filing the unfair labour practice complaint, considering the applicant's poor financial condition, lack of legal knowledge, remote location, and false hope of reinstatement. The court ordered registration of the original complaint under the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions & Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971, noting that deciding cases on merits rather than technicalities advances justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary The Labour Court at Kolhapur allowed an application for condonation of delay filed by an unemployed forest worker seeking to challenge his oral termination from August 2022. The court found sufficient justification for the 2-year 2-month delay in filing the unfair labour practice complaint, considering the applicant's poor financial condition, lack of legal knowledge, remote location, and false hope of reinstatement. The court ordered registration of the original complaint under the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions & Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971, noting that deciding cases on merits rather than technicalities advances justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts