M/s. Forest Officer, Social Forestry Department, Ratnagiri (Management) vs Shankar Sitaram Vibhute Advocate - LATA SURESH MHASKE — 7/2022
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 39. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 30th March 2026.
Ref-IDA - Reference
CNR: MHLC080000852022
Filing Number
85/2022
Filing Date
04-Nov-2022
Registration No
7/2022
Registration Date
04-Nov-2022
Court
Labour Court, Ratnagiri
Judge
1-Judge
Last updated 26-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M/s. Forest Officer, Social Forestry Department, Ratnagiri (Management)
Adv. ANIRUDHA AVINASH PHANSEKAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.Shankar Sitaram Vibhute Advocate - LATA SURESH MHASKE
Case History
-
30-Mar-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
Evidence
Judge
-
25-Feb-2026
Evidence
Judge
-
28-Jan-2026
Documents
Judge
-
14-Jan-2026
Documents
Judge
-
02-Jan-2026
Say
Judge
-
29-Nov-2025
Say
Judge
-
19-Nov-2025
Order below Ex.View PDF
Summary: The Labour Court, Ratnagiri rejected the first party's application filed in Reference (IDA) NO. 7/2022. The first party had sought an order against the second party for failing to file a statement of claim, but the court found the application moot since the second party filed its statement of claim on the date of hearing. The court dismissed the application as no longer necessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Nov-2025
Say
Judge
-
29-Oct-2025
Order below Ex.View PDF
-
29-Oct-2025
Order below Ex.View PDF
-
29-Oct-2025
Statement of Claim
Judge
-
23-Sep-2025
Appearance
Judge
-
25-Aug-2025
Settlement
Judge
-
20-Aug-2025
Appearance
Judge
-
25-Jul-2025
Appearance
Judge
-
14-Jul-2025
Appearance
Judge
-
25-Jun-2025
Appearance
Judge
-
05-Jun-2025
Appearance
Judge
-
10-May-2025
Appearance
Judge
-
02-Apr-2025
Settlement
Judge
-
24-Mar-2025
Say
Judge
-
04-Feb-2025
Say
Judge
-
04-Jan-2025
Say
Judge
-
18-Dec-2024
Say
Judge
-
14-Dec-2024
Say
Judge
-
27-Nov-2024
Settlement
Judge
-
19-Nov-2024
Appearance
Judge
-
07-Nov-2024
Appearance
Judge
-
08-Oct-2024
Appearance
Judge
-
28-Sep-2024
Appearance
Judge
-
27-Aug-2024
Settlement
Judge
-
14-Aug-2024
Appearance
Judge
-
22-Jul-2024
Appearance
Judge
-
09-Jul-2024
Appearance
Judge
-
11-Jun-2024
Appearance
Judge
-
21-May-2024
Appearance
Judge
-
23-Apr-2024
Appearance
Judge
-
20-Mar-2024
Appearance
Judge
-
07-Mar-2024
Appearance
Judge
-
14-Feb-2024
Appearance
Judge
-
17-Jan-2024
Appearance
Judge
-
20-Dec-2023
Appearance
Judge
-
28-Nov-2023
Appearance
Judge
-
06-Nov-2023
Appearance
Judge
-
10-Oct-2023
Appearance
Judge
-
29-Sep-2023
Appearance
Judge
-
15-Sep-2023
Appearance
Judge
-
05-Sep-2023
Appearance
Judge
-
29-Aug-2023
Appearance
Judge
-
09-Aug-2023
Ex-parte Order
Judge
-
25-Jul-2023
Ex-parte Order
Judge
-
01-Jul-2023
Ex-parte Order
Judge
-
14-Jun-2023
Ex-parte Order
Judge
-
24-May-2023
Ex-parte Order
Judge
-
26-Apr-2023
Ex-parte Order
Judge
-
12-Apr-2023
Ex-parte Order
Judge
-
20-Mar-2023
Ex-parte Order
Judge
-
20-Feb-2023
Appearance
Judge
-
23-Jan-2023
Appearance
Judge
-
26-Dec-2022
Appearance
Judge
-
28-Nov-2022
Appearance
Judge
-
04-Nov-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
04-Nov-2022
Case filed
Registration No. 7/2022
Summary: The Labour Court, Ratnagiri rejected the first party's application filed in Reference (IDA) NO. 7/2022. The first party had sought an order against the second party for failing to file a statement of claim, but the court found the application moot since the second party filed its statement of claim on the date of hearing. The court dismissed the application as no longer necessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts