BHUSHAN DEVIDAS PAGAR vs DEPARTMENT CONTROLLER, STATE TRANSPORT, RATNAGIRI Advocate - MAKRAND MUKUND KADAM — 2/2026

Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 Section u/s28of4. Status: Written Statement. Next hearing: 31st March 2026.

Written Statement Next hearing 31-Mar-2026 this date has passed

Comp. ULP - Complaint

CNR: MHLC080000082026

Filing Number

11/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

2/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

Labour Court, Ratnagiri

Judge

1-Judge

Last updated 26-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Union and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 Section u/s28of4

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BHUSHAN DEVIDAS PAGAR

    Adv. ASHOK BAJIRAO KAMBLE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DEPARTMENT CONTROLLER, STATE TRANSPORT, RATNAGIRI Advocate - MAKRAND MUKUND KADAM

  2. 2.DIVISIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER STATE TRANSPORT, RATNAGIRI

    Adv. MAKRAND MUKUND KADAM

  3. 3.DIVISIONAL TRANSPORT SUPERINTENDENT, STATE TRANSPORT, RATNAGIRI

    Adv. MAKRAND MUKUND KADAM

Case History

  1. 31-Mar-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    Order below Ex.View PDF

    Summary Petition Dismissed. The court rejected the petitioner's application under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 for recognition of a workers' union and related relief. The court found the petitioner's claims unsubstantiated and ruled that the application lacked merit, directing that no further proceedings be initiated on the matter (dated 17/03/2026, Labor Court, Ratnagiri). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Mar-2026

    Written Statement

    Judge

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Argument

    Judge

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Hearing on Interim Relief

    Judge

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary Petition Dismissed. The court rejected the petitioner's application under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 for recognition of a workers' union and related relief. The court found the petitioner's claims unsubstantiated and ruled that the application lacked merit, directing that no further proceedings be initiated on the matter (dated 17/03/2026, Labor Court, Ratnagiri). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case