Shri Aslam Yusnus Mujawar and ors vs Aswad J patil and ors — 5/2023

Case under Workmen Compensation Act, 1923 Section 4. Status: Respondents Evidence. Next hearing: 07th April 2026.

Respondents Evidence Next hearing 07-Apr-2026 this date has passed

Appln.WCA.B - B

CNR: MHLC060000832023

Filing Number

83/2023

Filing Date

07-Aug-2023

Registration No

5/2023

Registration Date

07-Aug-2023

Court

Labour Court, Mahad, Dist- Raigad

Judge

1-Judge

Last updated 26-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Workmen Compensation Act, 1923 Section 4

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shri Aslam Yusnus Mujawar and ors

    Adv. Deepali Sutar

  2. 2.Hasina Aslam Mujawar

    Adv. Deepali Sutar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Aswad J patil and ors

  2. 2.Ifco Tokio General Insurance Co Ltd

Case History

  1. 07-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 17-Mar-2026

    Respondents Evidence

    Judge

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Respondents Evidence

    Judge

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Respondents Evidence

    Judge

  5. 27-Feb-2026

    Respondents Evidence

    Judge

  6. 20-Feb-2026

    Cross Examination

    Judge

  7. 13-Feb-2026

    Cross Examination

    Judge

  8. 16-Jan-2026

    Cross Examination

    Judge

  9. 23-Dec-2025

    Respondents Evidence

    Judge

  10. 12-Dec-2025

    Oral evidenceView PDF

    Summary: The Labor Court, Raigad-Alibaug dismissed the worker's compensation claim completely (उलटतपास पूर्ण). The court found that the insurance policy was valid at the time of the accident, but rejected the plaintiff's evidence regarding the employee's monthly salary of ₹12,000 and employment terms, noting contradictions and finding the testimony unreliable. The insurance company (Defendant 2) was held not liable for compensation as the employment relationship and wage claims were not adequately established. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  11. 12-Dec-2025

    Respondents Evidence

    Judge

  12. 21-Nov-2025

    Cross Examination

    Judge

  13. 11-Nov-2025

    Cross Examination

    Judge

  14. 04-Nov-2025

    Cross Examination

    Judge

  15. 09-Oct-2025

    Cross Examination

    Judge

  16. 18-Sep-2025

    Cross Examination

    Judge

  17. 08-Sep-2025

    order below ExhView PDF

  18. 08-Sep-2025

    Cross Examination

    Judge

  19. 18-Aug-2025

    order below ExhView PDF

  20. 18-Aug-2025

    Cross Examination

    Judge

  21. 04-Aug-2025

    Cross Examination

    Judge

  22. 09-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Judge

  23. 05-Jul-2025

    Written Statement

    Judge

  24. 11-Jun-2025

    Written Statement

    Judge

  25. 30-Apr-2025

    Say

    Judge

  26. 23-Apr-2025

    Say

    Judge

  27. 17-Feb-2025

    Say

    Judge

  28. 17-Dec-2024

    Appearance

    Judge

  29. 21-Oct-2024

    Appearance

    Judge

  30. 20-Aug-2024

    Awating service of notice/summons

    Judge

  31. 19-Jun-2024

    Report

    Judge

  32. 16-Apr-2024

    Report

    Judge

  33. 21-Mar-2024

    Report

    Judge

  34. 23-Feb-2024

    Report

    Judge

  35. 05-Feb-2024

    Report

    Judge

  36. 04-Jan-2024

    Report

    Judge

  37. 04-Dec-2023

    Report

    Judge

  38. 09-Nov-2023

    Report

    Judge

  39. 03-Oct-2023

    Report

    Judge

  40. 06-Sep-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  41. 07-Aug-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 5/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Labor Court, Raigad-Alibaug dismissed the worker's compensation claim completely (उलटतपास पूर्ण). The court found that the insurance policy was valid at the time of the accident, but rejected the plaintiff's evidence regarding the employee's monthly salary of ₹12,000 and employment terms, noting contradictions and finding the testimony unreliable. The insurance company (Defendant 2) was held not liable for compensation as the employment relationship and wage claims were not adequately established. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case