Pramod Devidas Lad vs M/s. Parle Biscuits Pvt. Ltd. and Ors. 1 Advocate - Vijay Mehta — 13/2024

Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act Section 28. Status: Cross Examination. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.

Comp.ULP - Complaint

CNR: MHLC060000792024

Cross Examination

Next Hearing

10th April 2026

Filing Number

79/2024

Filing Date

05-12-2024

Registration No

13/2024

Registration Date

05-12-2024

Court

Labour Court, Mahad, Dist- Raigad

Judge

1-Judge

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act Section 28

Petitioner(s)

Pramod Devidas Lad

Adv. Adv. Shruti M. Choudhari

Respondent(s)

M/s. Parle Biscuits Pvt. Ltd. and Ors. 1 Advocate - Vijay Mehta

Sanjay Gahlawat, Deupty General Manager

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Judge

06-03-2026

Cross Examination

17-02-2026

Cross Examination

16-01-2026

Cross Examination

12-12-2025

Cross Examination

14-11-2025

Cross Examination

Interim Orders

31-10-2025
order below Exh

Summary: The Labour Court at Alibag allowed the respondents' application to frame a preliminary issue regarding whether the complainant qualifies as a "workman" under the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947. The court found that the parties held contradictory positions—the complainant claimed he performed manual and skilled work, while the respondents contended he held a managerial position—making this a foundational issue requiring determination before proceeding further. Both parties will now present evidence on this preliminary issue. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Labour Court at Alibag allowed the respondents' application to frame a preliminary issue regarding whether the complainant qualifies as a "workman" under the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947. The court found that the parties held contradictory positions—the complainant claimed he performed manual and skilled work, while the respondents contended he held a managerial position—making this a foundational issue requiring determination before proceeding further. Both parties will now present evidence on this preliminary issue. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Labour Court, Mahad, Dist- Raigad All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case