Pramod Devidas Lad vs M/s. Parle Biscuits Pvt. Ltd. and Ors. 1 Advocate - Vijay Mehta — 13/2024
Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act Section 28. Status: Cross Examination. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.
Comp.ULP - Complaint
CNR: MHLC060000792024
Next Hearing
10th April 2026
Filing Number
79/2024
Filing Date
05-12-2024
Registration No
13/2024
Registration Date
05-12-2024
Court
Labour Court, Mahad, Dist- Raigad
Judge
1-Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Pramod Devidas Lad
Adv. Adv. Shruti M. Choudhari
Respondent(s)
M/s. Parle Biscuits Pvt. Ltd. and Ors. 1 Advocate - Vijay Mehta
Sanjay Gahlawat, Deupty General Manager
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judge
Cross Examination
Cross Examination
Cross Examination
Cross Examination
Cross Examination
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Cross Examination |
| 17-02-2026 | Cross Examination |
| 16-01-2026 | Cross Examination |
| 12-12-2025 | Cross Examination |
| 14-11-2025 | Cross Examination |
Interim Orders
Summary: The Labour Court at Alibag allowed the respondents' application to frame a preliminary issue regarding whether the complainant qualifies as a "workman" under the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947. The court found that the parties held contradictory positions—the complainant claimed he performed manual and skilled work, while the respondents contended he held a managerial position—making this a foundational issue requiring determination before proceeding further. Both parties will now present evidence on this preliminary issue. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Labour Court at Alibag allowed the respondents' application to frame a preliminary issue regarding whether the complainant qualifies as a "workman" under the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947. The court found that the parties held contradictory positions—the complainant claimed he performed manual and skilled work, while the respondents contended he held a managerial position—making this a foundational issue requiring determination before proceeding further. Both parties will now present evidence on this preliminary issue. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts