Mahananda Shailesh Gudphale and ors 2 vs Prashant Rajvir Singh Dhama and ors — 4/2022

Case under Workmen Compensation Act, 1923 Section 4. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.

Appln.WCA.B - B

CNR: MHLC060000642022

Issues

Next Hearing

10th April 2026

Filing Number

64/2022

Filing Date

26-07-2022

Registration No

4/2022

Registration Date

26-07-2022

Court

Labour Court, Mahad, Dist- Raigad

Judge

1-Judge

Acts & Sections

Workmen Compensation Act, 1923 Section 4

Petitioner(s)

Mahananda Shailesh Gudphale and ors 2

Adv. Swati Patil

Vadent S Gudphale

Kashibai Shankar Gudphale

Respondent(s)

Prashant Rajvir Singh Dhama and ors

Nitin Dhama

HDFC Ergo General Insurance Co Ltd.

Adv. Vijay Mehta

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Judge

20-03-2026

Issues

06-03-2026

Issues

23-02-2026

Report

16-01-2026

Report

19-12-2025

Report

Interim Orders

14-08-2025
order below Exh

Summary: The Labour Court rejected Respondent No. 3's application seeking dismissal of claims against Respondents 1 and 2 and deletion of its name from the proceedings. The court held that as the applicants are legal dependents of a deceased person with a valid insurance claim of approximately Rs. 12 lakh, dismissing the application would cause injustice. Costs awarded in cause. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Labour Court rejected Respondent No. 3's application seeking dismissal of claims against Respondents 1 and 2 and deletion of its name from the proceedings. The court held that as the applicants are legal dependents of a deceased person with a valid insurance claim of approximately Rs. 12 lakh, dismissing the application would cause injustice. Costs awarded in cause. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Labour Court, Mahad, Dist- Raigad All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case