Mahananda Shailesh Gudphale and ors 2 vs Prashant Rajvir Singh Dhama and ors — 4/2022

Case under Workmen Compensation Act, 1923 Section 4. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.

Issues Next hearing 10-Apr-2026 this date has passed

Appln.WCA.B - B

CNR: MHLC060000642022

Filing Number

64/2022

Filing Date

26-Jul-2022

Registration No

4/2022

Registration Date

26-Jul-2022

Court

Labour Court, Mahad, Dist- Raigad

Judge

1-Judge

Last updated 26-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Workmen Compensation Act, 1923 Section 4

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Mahananda Shailesh Gudphale and ors 2

    Adv. Swati Patil

  2. 2.Vadent S Gudphale

  3. 3.Kashibai Shankar Gudphale

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Prashant Rajvir Singh Dhama and ors

  2. 2.Nitin Dhama

  3. 3.HDFC Ergo General Insurance Co Ltd.

    Adv. Vijay Mehta

Case History

  1. 10-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 20-Mar-2026

    Issues

    Judge

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Issues

    Judge

  4. 23-Feb-2026

    Report

    Judge

  5. 16-Jan-2026

    Report

    Judge

  6. 19-Dec-2025

    Report

    Judge

  7. 25-Nov-2025

    Report

    Judge

  8. 07-Nov-2025

    Report

    Judge

  9. 09-Oct-2025

    Report

    Judge

  10. 17-Sep-2025

    Report

    Judge

  11. 14-Aug-2025

    order below ExhView PDF

    Summary: The Labour Court rejected Respondent No. 3's application seeking dismissal of claims against Respondents 1 and 2 and deletion of its name from the proceedings. The court held that as the applicants are legal dependents of a deceased person with a valid insurance claim of approximately Rs. 12 lakh, dismissing the application would cause injustice. Costs awarded in cause. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  12. 14-Aug-2025

    Report

    Judge

  13. 07-Aug-2025

    Say

    Judge

  14. 09-Jul-2025

    Say

    Judge

  15. 16-Jun-2025

    Say

    Judge

  16. 22-Apr-2025

    Awating service of notice/summons

    Judge

  17. 17-Feb-2025

    Awating service of notice/summons

    Judge

  18. 22-Jan-2025

    Order on exh

    Judge

  19. 17-Dec-2024

    Steps

    Judge

  20. 22-Oct-2024

    Steps

    Judge

  21. 20-Aug-2024

    Hearing

    Judge

  22. 20-Jun-2024

    Hearing

    Judge

  23. 15-Apr-2024

    Hearing

    Judge

  24. 20-Mar-2024

    Appearance

    Judge

  25. 22-Feb-2024

    Awating service of notice/summons

    Judge

  26. 18-Jan-2024

    Awating service of notice/summons

    Judge

  27. 08-Jan-2024

    Steps

    Judge

  28. 09-Dec-2023

    Steps

    Judge

  29. 05-Dec-2023

    Steps

    Judge

  30. 05-Oct-2023

    Steps

    Judge

  31. 05-Sep-2023

    Steps

    Judge

  32. 11-Aug-2023

    Steps

    Judge

  33. 06-Jul-2023

    Steps

    Judge

  34. 03-Jun-2023

    Steps

    Judge

  35. 02-May-2023

    Written Statement

    Judge

  36. 09-Mar-2023

    Written Statement

    Judge

  37. 07-Feb-2023

    Written Statement

    Judge

  38. 03-Jan-2023

    Steps

    Judge

  39. 03-Dec-2022

    Steps

    Judge

  40. 04-Nov-2022

    Say

    Judge

  41. 08-Sep-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  42. 26-Jul-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 4/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Labour Court rejected Respondent No. 3's application seeking dismissal of claims against Respondents 1 and 2 and deletion of its name from the proceedings. The court held that as the applicants are legal dependents of a deceased person with a valid insurance claim of approximately Rs. 12 lakh, dismissing the application would cause injustice. Costs awarded in cause. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case