Zakirhusain Ibrahim Shaikh vs Divisinal ControllerDC MSRTC Mumbai Division, and ors. Advocate - Adv Shubhada Mokal — 7/2025
Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act Section 28. Status: Judgment. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.
Comp.ULP - Complaint
CNR: MHLC060000612025
Next Hearing
10th April 2026
Filing Number
101/2025
Filing Date
08-09-2025
Registration No
7/2025
Registration Date
08-09-2025
Court
Labour Court, Mahad, Dist- Raigad
Judge
1-Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Zakirhusain Ibrahim Shaikh
Adv. Vijay Mehta
Respondent(s)
Divisinal ControllerDC MSRTC Mumbai Division, and ors. Advocate - Adv Shubhada Mokal
Divisional Traffic SuperintendantDTS MSRTC Mumbai Division
The Depot Manager Depot-Uran Raigad.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judge
Judgment
Evidence
Cross Examination
Respondents Evidence
Respondents Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-03-2026 | Judgment |
| 06-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 20-02-2026 | Cross Examination |
| 06-02-2026 | Respondents Evidence |
| 23-01-2026 | Respondents Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary The Labour Court at Alibag held that while the departmental enquiry against the MSRTC bus driver was conducted fairly and in accordance with natural justice principles, the enquiry officer's findings were perverse. The court found that imposing dismissal punishment for the same misconduct after already stopping the driver's yearly increment for six months violated principles of natural justice and equity, constituting unlawful double punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Labour Court at Alibag held that while the departmental enquiry against the MSRTC bus driver was conducted fairly and in accordance with natural justice principles, the enquiry officer's findings were perverse. The court found that imposing dismissal punishment for the same misconduct after already stopping the driver's yearly increment for six months violated principles of natural justice and equity, constituting unlawful double punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts