Mohammed Hashim and ors 1 vs Kulbir Komalchand Singh and ors — 3/2021

Case under Workmen Compensation Act, 1923 Section 4. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 10-Apr-2026 this date has passed

Appln.WCA.B - B

CNR: MHLC060000492021

Filing Number

49/2021

Filing Date

02-Jun-2021

Registration No

3/2021

Registration Date

02-Jun-2021

Court

Labour Court, Mahad, Dist- Raigad

Judge

1-Judge

Last updated 26-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Workmen Compensation Act, 1923 Section 4

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Mohammed Hashim and ors 1

    Adv. Smt. Bharti Devlekar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Kulbir Komalchand Singh and ors

  2. 2.The New India Assurance Co Ltd.

    Adv. Rajendra Gaikwad

Case History

  1. 10-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Judge

  3. 27-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Judge

  4. 20-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Judge

  5. 13-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Judge

  6. 16-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Judge

  7. 19-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Judge

  8. 05-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Judge

  9. 21-Nov-2025

    Argument

    Judge

  10. 11-Nov-2025

    Argument

    Judge

  11. 04-Nov-2025

    Respondents Evidence

    Judge

  12. 09-Oct-2025

    Respondents Evidence

    Judge

  13. 18-Sep-2025

    Respondents Evidence

    Judge

  14. 21-Aug-2025

    order below ExhView PDF

    Summary: The Labour Court (Mahad) allowed the application filed by Mohammad Hashim and others against Kulbir Komalchand Singh and others. The court found that the matter had been pending for evidence for a long time with no evidence adduced despite sufficient opportunity given to the parties. The court granted the applicant another opportunity to lead evidence to allow the case to be adjudicated on merit. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  15. 21-Aug-2025

    Respondents Evidence

    Judge

  16. 31-Jul-2025

    Respondents Evidence

    Judge

  17. 17-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Judge

  18. 03-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Judge

  19. 12-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Judge

  20. 10-May-2025

    Evidence

    Judge

  21. 08-May-2025

    Lok-Adalat - 37

    Judge

  22. 24-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Judge

  23. 20-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Judge

  24. 20-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Judge

  25. 22-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Judge

  26. 22-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Judge

  27. 15-Jul-2024

    Issues

    Judge

  28. 20-Jun-2024

    Issues

    Judge

  29. 15-Apr-2024

    Dismissal Order

    Judge

  30. 21-Mar-2024

    Steps

    Judge

  31. 20-Feb-2024

    Steps

    Judge

  32. 09-Feb-2024

    Steps

    Judge

  33. 05-Jan-2024

    Steps

    Judge

  34. 07-Dec-2023

    Steps

    Judge

  35. 05-Oct-2023

    Steps

    Judge

  36. 08-Sep-2023

    Steps

    Judge

  37. 02-Aug-2023

    Steps

    Judge

  38. 03-Jul-2023

    Steps

    Judge

  39. 03-Jun-2023

    Steps

    Judge

  40. 03-Apr-2023

    Steps

    Judge

  41. 03-Feb-2023

    Report

    Judge

  42. 06-Dec-2022

    Steps

    Judge

  43. 11-Nov-2022

    Steps

    Judge

  44. 03-Oct-2022

    Steps

    Judge

  45. 01-Aug-2022

    Steps

    Judge

  46. 01-Jul-2022

    Steps

    Judge

  47. 01-Jun-2022

    Steps

    Judge

  48. 03-Mar-2022

    Steps

    Judge

  49. 05-Jan-2022

    Report

    Judge

  50. 01-Dec-2021

    Report

    Judge

  51. 01-Oct-2021

    Steps

    Judge

  52. 01-Aug-2021

    Steps

    Judge

  53. 05-Jul-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  54. 02-Jun-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 3/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Labour Court (Mahad) allowed the application filed by Mohammad Hashim and others against Kulbir Komalchand Singh and others. The court found that the matter had been pending for evidence for a long time with no evidence adduced despite sufficient opportunity given to the parties. The court granted the applicant another opportunity to lead evidence to allow the case to be adjudicated on merit. No costs awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case