Milind Jagannath Mhatre vs Divisional Traffic Officer MSRTC Raigad Division Ramwadi Pen Raigad Advocate - Adv Shubhada Mokal — 4/2026
Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act Section 28. Status: Hearing on Interim Relief. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.
Comp.ULP - Complaint
CNR: MHLC060000292026
Next Hearing
10th April 2026
Filing Number
29/2026
Filing Date
26-02-2026
Registration No
4/2026
Registration Date
26-02-2026
Court
Labour Court, Mahad, Dist- Raigad
Judge
1-Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Milind Jagannath Mhatre
Adv. Vijay Mehta
Respondent(s)
Divisional Traffic Officer MSRTC Raigad Division Ramwadi Pen Raigad Advocate - Adv Shubhada Mokal
Maharashtra State Road Transportation Raigad Division.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judge
Hearing on Interim Relief
Hearing on Interim Relief
Report
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-03-2026 | Hearing on Interim Relief |
| 06-03-2026 | Hearing on Interim Relief |
| 27-02-2026 | Report |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Complaint (ULP) No. 04/2026 | Labour Court, Alibag-Raigad | 27/02/2026 The Labour Court granted an ad interim injunction restraining MSRTC from acting on the show-cause notice dated 27/01/2026 against conductor Milind Mhatre until further orders. The court found a prima facie case in the complainant's favor, noting that evidence is required to prove loss caused by alleged negligence, and that the complainant deserves a fair opportunity to present his defense before any termination action is taken. The matter is scheduled for hearing on 06/03/2026 to determine if the interim injunction should be made absolute. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Complaint (ULP) No. 04/2026 | Labour Court, Alibag-Raigad | 27/02/2026 The Labour Court granted an ad interim injunction restraining MSRTC from acting on the show-cause notice dated 27/01/2026 against conductor Milind Mhatre until further orders. The court found a prima facie case in the complainant's favor, noting that evidence is required to prove loss caused by alleged negligence, and that the complainant deserves a fair opportunity to present his defense before any termination action is taken. The matter is scheduled for hearing on 06/03/2026 to determine if the interim injunction should be made absolute. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts