Ravindra Ramchandra Karade vs Divisional Traffic SuperintendantDTS MSRTC Mumbai Division Advocate - Adv Shubhada Mokal — 3/2026
Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act Section 28. Status: Interim Order. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.
Comp.ULP - Complaint
CNR: MHLC060000182026
Filing Number
18/2026
Filing Date
12-Feb-2026
Registration No
3/2026
Registration Date
12-Feb-2026
Court
Labour Court, Mahad, Dist- Raigad
Judge
1-Judge
Last updated 26-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Ravindra Ramchandra Karade
Adv. Vijay Mehta
Respondent(s)
-
1.Divisional Traffic SuperintendantDTS MSRTC Mumbai Division Advocate - Adv Shubhada Mokal
-
2.MSRTC Mumbai Division Through its Depot Manager Uran Depot
Case History
-
10-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
20-Mar-2026
Interim Order
Judge
-
06-Mar-2026
Hearing on Interim Relief
Judge
-
27-Feb-2026
Hearing on Interim Relief
Judge
-
20-Feb-2026
Hearing on Interim Relief
Judge
-
13-Feb-2026
order below ExhView PDF
Summary: The Labour Court at Alibag granted ad interim injunction restraining MSRTC (respondent) from acting upon the show-cause notice dated 04/02/2026 issued to complainant Ravindra Karade, a driver charged with misconduct. The court found a prima facie case in the complainant's favor and held that sufficient opportunity must be given to adduce evidence before termination of service. A notice has been issued to the respondent corporation to show cause why the ad interim injunction should not be made absolute, returnable on 20/02/2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 3/2026
Summary: The Labour Court at Alibag granted ad interim injunction restraining MSRTC (respondent) from acting upon the show-cause notice dated 04/02/2026 issued to complainant Ravindra Karade, a driver charged with misconduct. The court found a prima facie case in the complainant's favor and held that sufficient opportunity must be given to adduce evidence before termination of service. A notice has been issued to the respondent corporation to show cause why the ad interim injunction should not be made absolute, returnable on 20/02/2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts