Ravindra Ramchandra Karade vs Divisional Traffic SuperintendantDTS MSRTC Mumbai Division Advocate - Adv Shubhada Mokal — 3/2026

Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act Section 28. Status: Interim Order. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.

Comp.ULP - Complaint

CNR: MHLC060000182026

Interim Order

Next Hearing

10th April 2026

Filing Number

18/2026

Filing Date

12-02-2026

Registration No

3/2026

Registration Date

12-02-2026

Court

Labour Court, Mahad, Dist- Raigad

Judge

1-Judge

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act Section 28

Petitioner(s)

Ravindra Ramchandra Karade

Adv. Vijay Mehta

Respondent(s)

Divisional Traffic SuperintendantDTS MSRTC Mumbai Division Advocate - Adv Shubhada Mokal

MSRTC Mumbai Division Through its Depot Manager Uran Depot

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Judge

20-03-2026

Interim Order

06-03-2026

Hearing on Interim Relief

27-02-2026

Hearing on Interim Relief

20-02-2026

Hearing on Interim Relief

13-02-2026

Report

Interim Orders

13-02-2026
order below Exh

Summary: The Labour Court at Alibag granted ad interim injunction restraining MSRTC (respondent) from acting upon the show-cause notice dated 04/02/2026 issued to complainant Ravindra Karade, a driver charged with misconduct. The court found a prima facie case in the complainant's favor and held that sufficient opportunity must be given to adduce evidence before termination of service. A notice has been issued to the respondent corporation to show cause why the ad interim injunction should not be made absolute, returnable on 20/02/2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Labour Court at Alibag granted ad interim injunction restraining MSRTC (respondent) from acting upon the show-cause notice dated 04/02/2026 issued to complainant Ravindra Karade, a driver charged with misconduct. The court found a prima facie case in the complainant's favor and held that sufficient opportunity must be given to adduce evidence before termination of service. A notice has been issued to the respondent corporation to show cause why the ad interim injunction should not be made absolute, returnable on 20/02/2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Labour Court, Mahad, Dist- Raigad All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case