Ravindra Ramchandra Karade vs Divisional Traffic SuperintendantDTS MSRTC Mumbai Division Advocate - Adv Shubhada Mokal — 3/2026
Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act Section 28. Status: Interim Order. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.
Comp.ULP - Complaint
CNR: MHLC060000182026
Next Hearing
10th April 2026
Filing Number
18/2026
Filing Date
12-02-2026
Registration No
3/2026
Registration Date
12-02-2026
Court
Labour Court, Mahad, Dist- Raigad
Judge
1-Judge
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ravindra Ramchandra Karade
Adv. Vijay Mehta
Respondent(s)
Divisional Traffic SuperintendantDTS MSRTC Mumbai Division Advocate - Adv Shubhada Mokal
MSRTC Mumbai Division Through its Depot Manager Uran Depot
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Judge
Interim Order
Hearing on Interim Relief
Hearing on Interim Relief
Hearing on Interim Relief
Report
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-03-2026 | Interim Order |
| 06-03-2026 | Hearing on Interim Relief |
| 27-02-2026 | Hearing on Interim Relief |
| 20-02-2026 | Hearing on Interim Relief |
| 13-02-2026 | Report |
Interim Orders
Summary: The Labour Court at Alibag granted ad interim injunction restraining MSRTC (respondent) from acting upon the show-cause notice dated 04/02/2026 issued to complainant Ravindra Karade, a driver charged with misconduct. The court found a prima facie case in the complainant's favor and held that sufficient opportunity must be given to adduce evidence before termination of service. A notice has been issued to the respondent corporation to show cause why the ad interim injunction should not be made absolute, returnable on 20/02/2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Labour Court at Alibag granted ad interim injunction restraining MSRTC (respondent) from acting upon the show-cause notice dated 04/02/2026 issued to complainant Ravindra Karade, a driver charged with misconduct. The court found a prima facie case in the complainant's favor and held that sufficient opportunity must be given to adduce evidence before termination of service. A notice has been issued to the respondent corporation to show cause why the ad interim injunction should not be made absolute, returnable on 20/02/2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts