Jitendra Jayant Deshpande vs MSRTC and ors 2 Advocate - Adv Shubhada Mokal — 2/2021
Case under Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act Section 28. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.
Comp.ULP - Complaint
CNR: MHLC060000072021
Filing Number
7/2021
Filing Date
05-Jan-2021
Registration No
2/2021
Registration Date
05-Jan-2021
Court
Labour Court, Mahad, Dist- Raigad
Judge
1-Judge
Last updated 26-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Jitendra Jayant Deshpande
Adv. Vijay Mehta
Respondent(s)
-
1.MSRTC and ors 2 Advocate - Adv Shubhada Mokal
-
2.Divisional Traffic Suprintendent
-
3.Depot Manager
Case History
-
10-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
20-Mar-2026
Evidence
Judge
-
06-Mar-2026
Cross Examination
Judge
-
20-Feb-2026
Cross Examination
Judge
-
06-Feb-2026
Cross Examination
Judge
-
23-Jan-2026
Evidence
Judge
-
13-Jan-2026
Evidence
Judge
-
09-Jan-2026
Evidence
Judge
-
12-Dec-2025
Evidence
Judge
-
21-Nov-2025
Evidence
Judge
-
31-Oct-2025
Evidence
Judge
-
10-Oct-2025
Evidence
Judge
-
19-Sep-2025
Evidence
Judge
-
29-Aug-2025
Evidence
Judge
-
22-Aug-2025
Issues
Judge
-
06-Aug-2025
JudgmentView PDF
Summary The Labour Court at Mahad dismissed the Unfair Labour Practice (ULP) complaint filed by Jitendra Jayant Deshpande, an MSRTC conductor, challenging his misconduct findings. The court held that the internal departmental inquiry was conducted fairly and in accordance with natural justice principles, and that the inquiry officer's findings—that the complainant misappropriated Rs. 4,000 by issuing unauthorized bus passes—were not perverse. The court rejected arguments regarding missing handwriting expert reports and unexamined witnesses, finding sufficient evidence on record to sustain the misconduct charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Aug-2025
Issues
Judge
-
04-Aug-2025
Order
Judge
-
01-Aug-2025
Order
Judge
-
24-Jul-2025
Hearing on Preliminary Issues
Judge
-
18-Jul-2025
Hearing on Preliminary Issues
Judge
-
20-Jun-2025
Evidence
Judge
-
05-Jun-2025
Evidence
Judge
-
17-Apr-2025
Evidence
Judge
-
18-Mar-2025
Say
Judge
-
20-Jan-2025
Say
Judge
-
17-Dec-2024
Amendment
Judge
-
22-Oct-2024
Amendment
Judge
-
19-Sep-2024
Say
Judge
-
21-Aug-2024
Say
Judge
-
19-Jul-2024
Say
Judge
-
19-Jun-2024
Say
Judge
-
18-Apr-2024
Steps
Judge
-
21-Mar-2024
Steps
Judge
-
06-Feb-2024
Steps
Judge
-
04-Jan-2024
Steps
Judge
-
06-Dec-2023
Steps
Judge
-
05-Oct-2023
Steps
Judge
-
08-Sep-2023
Steps
Judge
-
09-Aug-2023
Steps
Judge
-
04-Jul-2023
Steps
Judge
-
01-Jun-2023
Steps
Judge
-
02-May-2023
Steps
Judge
-
08-Mar-2023
Steps
Judge
-
08-Feb-2023
Steps
Judge
-
03-Jan-2023
Steps
Judge
-
09-Nov-2022
Steps
Judge
-
05-Aug-2022
Steps
Judge
-
14-Jun-2022
Steps
Judge
-
06-May-2022
Steps
Judge
-
07-Mar-2022
Steps
Judge
-
08-Feb-2022
Steps
Judge
-
09-Dec-2021
Steps
Judge
-
30-Nov-2021
Steps
Judge
-
05-Oct-2021
Steps
Judge
-
03-Aug-2021
Steps
Judge
-
03-May-2021
Steps
Judge
-
03-Mar-2021
Steps
Judge
-
02-Feb-2021
Steps
Judge
-
20-Jan-2021
Steps
Judge
-
08-Jan-2021
Order on I RView PDF
-
08-Jan-2021
Steps
Judge
-
07-Jan-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Jan-2021
Case filed
Registration No. 2/2021
Summary The Labour Court at Mahad dismissed the Unfair Labour Practice (ULP) complaint filed by Jitendra Jayant Deshpande, an MSRTC conductor, challenging his misconduct findings. The court held that the internal departmental inquiry was conducted fairly and in accordance with natural justice principles, and that the inquiry officer's findings—that the complainant misappropriated Rs. 4,000 by issuing unauthorized bus passes—were not perverse. The court rejected arguments regarding missing handwriting expert reports and unexamined witnesses, finding sufficient evidence on record to sustain the misconduct charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts