Sushila Harikeshkumar Gaud vs Mr. Shahensha Hussain Sayyed — 222/2024
Case under Workmens Compensation Act, 1923 Section 4. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT on 13th March 2026.
Appln.WCA.I - I
CNR: MHLC040006122024
Filing Number
612/2024
Filing Date
11-Jun-2024
Registration No
222/2024
Registration Date
12-Jun-2024
Court
Labour Court,Thane
Judge
1-Judge, First Labour Court
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT
Last updated 26-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sushila Harikeshkumar Gaud
Adv. Vishnu D. Gupta
-
2.Ku. Shushboo Harikeshkumar Gaud
Respondent(s)
-
1.Mr. Shahensha Hussain Sayyed
-
2.The New India Assurance Company Ltd.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Summary: The First Labour Court, Thane allowed the restoration application filed by the legal heirs (widow and daughter) of deceased worker Harikeshkumar Gaud. The original compensation claim under the Employees' Compensation Act, filed in 2011 following an employment injury, was dismissed in default in 2013 due to lack of advocate follow-up after the worker's death in August 2011. The court found good and sufficient cause for restoration, holding that the applicants should not suffer due to lack of communication with their advocate, and noting that the Employees' Compensation Act is social welfare legislation. The court restored the original application to its file and permitted the legal heirs to proceed with the matter on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
Judge, First Labour Court
-
06-Mar-2026
Judgment
Judge, First Labour Court
-
24-Feb-2026
Judgment
Judge, First Labour Court
-
10-Feb-2026
Judgment
Judge, First Labour Court
-
03-Feb-2026
Judgment
Judge, First Labour Court
-
30-Dec-2025
Argument
I/c Judge
-
09-Dec-2025
Argument
I/c Judge
-
25-Nov-2025
Argument
I/c Judge
-
04-Nov-2025
Respondents Evidence
I/c Judge
-
23-Sep-2025
Evidence
I/c Judge
-
22-Jul-2025
Evidence
I/c Judge
-
21-Jun-2025
Evidence
I/c Judge
-
15-Apr-2025
Evidence
Judge, Fourth Labour Court
-
04-Mar-2025
Evidence
Judge, Fourth Labour Court
-
25-Feb-2025
Reply
Judge, Fourth Labour Court
-
28-Jan-2025
Reply
Judge, Fourth Labour Court
-
30-Nov-2024
Reply
Judge, Fourth Labour Court
-
05-Oct-2024
Reply
Judge, Fourth Labour Court
-
03-Aug-2024
Reply
Judge, Fourth Labour Court
-
06-Jul-2024
Notice
Judge, Fourth Labour Court
-
13-Jun-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Jun-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 222/2024
Summary: The First Labour Court, Thane allowed the restoration application filed by the legal heirs (widow and daughter) of deceased worker Harikeshkumar Gaud. The original compensation claim under the Employees' Compensation Act, filed in 2011 following an employment injury, was dismissed in default in 2013 due to lack of advocate follow-up after the worker's death in August 2011. The court found good and sufficient cause for restoration, holding that the applicants should not suffer due to lack of communication with their advocate, and noting that the Employees' Compensation Act is social welfare legislation. The court restored the original application to its file and permitted the legal heirs to proceed with the matter on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts