Sushila Harikeshkumar Gaud vs Mr. Shahensha Hussain Sayyed — 222/2024

Case under Workmens Compensation Act, 1923 Section 4. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT on 13th March 2026.

Appln.WCA.I - I

CNR: MHLC040006122024

Case disposed

Filing Number

612/2024

Filing Date

11-06-2024

Registration No

222/2024

Registration Date

12-06-2024

Court

Labour Court,Thane

Judge

1-JUDGE, First Labour Court

Decision Date

13th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT

Acts & Sections

Workmens Compensation Act, 1923 Section 4

Petitioner(s)

Sushila Harikeshkumar Gaud

Adv. Vishnu D. Gupta

Ku. Shushboo Harikeshkumar Gaud

Respondent(s)

Mr. Shahensha Hussain Sayyed

The New India Assurance Company Ltd.

Hearing History

Judge: 1-JUDGE, First Labour Court

13-03-2026

Disposed

06-03-2026

Judgment

24-02-2026

Judgment

10-02-2026

Judgment

03-02-2026

Judgment

Final Orders / Judgements

13-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

Summary: The First Labour Court, Thane allowed the restoration application filed by the legal heirs (widow and daughter) of deceased worker Harikeshkumar Gaud. The original compensation claim under the Employees' Compensation Act, filed in 2011 following an employment injury, was dismissed in default in 2013 due to lack of advocate follow-up after the worker's death in August 2011. The court found good and sufficient cause for restoration, holding that the applicants should not suffer due to lack of communication with their advocate, and noting that the Employees' Compensation Act is social welfare legislation. The court restored the original application to its file and permitted the legal heirs to proceed with the matter on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The First Labour Court, Thane allowed the restoration application filed by the legal heirs (widow and daughter) of deceased worker Harikeshkumar Gaud. The original compensation claim under the Employees' Compensation Act, filed in 2011 following an employment injury, was dismissed in default in 2013 due to lack of advocate follow-up after the worker's death in August 2011. The court found good and sufficient cause for restoration, holding that the applicants should not suffer due to lack of communication with their advocate, and noting that the Employees' Compensation Act is social welfare legislation. The court restored the original application to its file and permitted the legal heirs to proceed with the matter on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Labour Court,Thane All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case