M/S Dhingar Silk Mills Pvt. Ltd. vs Shri Shrinivas Yallapa Kanige Advocate - Smita Paratkar — 59/2023
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 15th May 2026.
Ref IDA - Reference
CNR: MHLC040005602023
Filing Number
560/2023
Filing Date
17-Jul-2023
Registration No
59/2023
Registration Date
27-Jul-2023
Court
Labour Court,Thane
Judge
3-Judge, Third Labour Court
Last updated 26-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M/S Dhingar Silk Mills Pvt. Ltd.
Adv. Vinod Kumar Singh
-
2.Shr Shantilal Dhingarmal Jain
-
3.Ashokkumar Dhigalmal Jain
-
4.Shri Sukanlal Dhingarmal Jain
-
5.Shri Basandevi Shantilal Jain
Respondent(s)
-
1.Shri Shrinivas Yallapa Kanige Advocate - Smita Paratkar
Case History
-
15-May-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
Evidence
Judge, Third Labour Court
-
30-Jan-2026
Evidence
Judge, Third Labour Court
-
17-Dec-2025
Compliance
Judge, Third Labour Court
-
17-Nov-2025
Compliance
Judge, Third Labour Court
-
27-Oct-2025
Compliance
Judge, Third Labour Court
-
29-Sep-2025
Compliance
Judge, Third Labour Court
-
25-Aug-2025
Compliance
Judge, Third Labour Court
-
11-Aug-2025
Order below ExhView PDF
Summary: The Third Labour Court at Thane allowed the application filed by First Party No. 5 to delete her name from the dispute. The court found that First Party No. 5 has no employer-employee relationship with the Second Party (who sought reinstatement as a warper) and was impleaded merely because the company's electricity connection is in her name, making her not a necessary party to the reference. The court ordered her name be deleted from the array of parties, allowing the case to proceed on merit without her involvement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Aug-2025
Compliance
Judge, Third Labour Court
-
11-Jul-2025
Hearing below Exh.
Judge, Third Labour Court
-
18-Jun-2025
Hearing below Exh.
Judge, Third Labour Court
-
28-Apr-2025
Hearing below Exh.
Judge, Third Labour Court
-
09-Apr-2025
Hearing below Exh.
Judge, Third Labour Court
-
28-Mar-2025
Hearing below Exh.
Judge, Third Labour Court
-
03-Mar-2025
Hearing below Exh.
Judge, Third Labour Court
-
20-Jan-2025
Hearing below Exh.
Judge, Third Labour Court
-
06-Jan-2025
Hearing below Exh.
Judge, Third Labour Court
-
02-Dec-2024
Hearing below Exh.
Judge, Third Labour Court
-
06-Nov-2024
Say
Judge, Third Labour Court
-
07-Oct-2024
Say
Judge, Third Labour Court
-
02-Sep-2024
Say
Judge, Third Labour Court
-
14-Aug-2024
Written Statement
Judge, Third Labour Court
-
05-Jul-2024
Written Statement
Judge, Third Labour Court
-
07-Jun-2024
Appearance
Judge, Third Labour Court
-
03-May-2024
Report
Judge, Third Labour Court
-
10-Apr-2024
Report
Judge, Third Labour Court
-
13-Mar-2024
Report
Judge, Third Labour Court
-
09-Feb-2024
Report
Judge, Third Labour Court
-
22-Dec-2023
Notice
Judge, Third Labour Court
-
24-Nov-2023
Written Statement
Judge, Third Labour Court
-
13-Oct-2023
Written Statement
Judge, Third Labour Court
-
11-Sep-2023
Report
Judge, Third Labour Court
-
31-Jul-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-Jul-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 59/2023
Summary: The Third Labour Court at Thane allowed the application filed by First Party No. 5 to delete her name from the dispute. The court found that First Party No. 5 has no employer-employee relationship with the Second Party (who sought reinstatement as a warper) and was impleaded merely because the company's electricity connection is in her name, making her not a necessary party to the reference. The court ordered her name be deleted from the array of parties, allowing the case to proceed on merit without her involvement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts