M/S Dhingar Silk Mills Pvt. Ltd. vs Shri Shrinivas Yallapa Kanige Advocate - Smita Paratkar — 59/2023
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 15th May 2026.
Ref IDA - Reference
CNR: MHLC040005602023
Next Hearing
15th May 2026
Filing Number
560/2023
Filing Date
17-07-2023
Registration No
59/2023
Registration Date
27-07-2023
Court
Labour Court,Thane
Judge
3-JUDGE, Third Labour Court
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M/S Dhingar Silk Mills Pvt. Ltd.
Adv. Vinod Kumar Singh
Shr Shantilal Dhingarmal Jain
Ashokkumar Dhigalmal Jain
Shri Sukanlal Dhingarmal Jain
Shri Basandevi Shantilal Jain
Respondent(s)
Shri Shrinivas Yallapa Kanige Advocate - Smita Paratkar
Hearing History
Judge: 3-JUDGE, Third Labour Court
Evidence
Evidence
Compliance
Compliance
Compliance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 30-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 17-12-2025 | Compliance |
| 17-11-2025 | Compliance |
| 27-10-2025 | Compliance |
Interim Orders
Summary: The Third Labour Court at Thane allowed the application filed by First Party No. 5 to delete her name from the dispute. The court found that First Party No. 5 has no employer-employee relationship with the Second Party (who sought reinstatement as a warper) and was impleaded merely because the company's electricity connection is in her name, making her not a necessary party to the reference. The court ordered her name be deleted from the array of parties, allowing the case to proceed on merit without her involvement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Third Labour Court at Thane allowed the application filed by First Party No. 5 to delete her name from the dispute. The court found that First Party No. 5 has no employer-employee relationship with the Second Party (who sought reinstatement as a warper) and was impleaded merely because the company's electricity connection is in her name, making her not a necessary party to the reference. The court ordered her name be deleted from the array of parties, allowing the case to proceed on merit without her involvement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts