M/S Dhingar Silk Mills Pvt. Ltd. vs Shri Shrinivas Yallapa Kanige Advocate - Smita Paratkar — 59/2023

Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 15th May 2026.

Ref IDA - Reference

CNR: MHLC040005602023

Evidence

Next Hearing

15th May 2026

Filing Number

560/2023

Filing Date

17-07-2023

Registration No

59/2023

Registration Date

27-07-2023

Court

Labour Court,Thane

Judge

3-JUDGE, Third Labour Court

Acts & Sections

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 10

Petitioner(s)

M/S Dhingar Silk Mills Pvt. Ltd.

Adv. Vinod Kumar Singh

Shr Shantilal Dhingarmal Jain

Ashokkumar Dhigalmal Jain

Shri Sukanlal Dhingarmal Jain

Shri Basandevi Shantilal Jain

Respondent(s)

Shri Shrinivas Yallapa Kanige Advocate - Smita Paratkar

Hearing History

Judge: 3-JUDGE, Third Labour Court

06-03-2026

Evidence

30-01-2026

Evidence

17-12-2025

Compliance

17-11-2025

Compliance

27-10-2025

Compliance

Interim Orders

11-08-2025
Order below Exh

Summary: The Third Labour Court at Thane allowed the application filed by First Party No. 5 to delete her name from the dispute. The court found that First Party No. 5 has no employer-employee relationship with the Second Party (who sought reinstatement as a warper) and was impleaded merely because the company's electricity connection is in her name, making her not a necessary party to the reference. The court ordered her name be deleted from the array of parties, allowing the case to proceed on merit without her involvement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Third Labour Court at Thane allowed the application filed by First Party No. 5 to delete her name from the dispute. The court found that First Party No. 5 has no employer-employee relationship with the Second Party (who sought reinstatement as a warper) and was impleaded merely because the company's electricity connection is in her name, making her not a necessary party to the reference. The court ordered her name be deleted from the array of parties, allowing the case to proceed on merit without her involvement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Labour Court,Thane All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case