M/s.Sun Silk Mills and ors.5 vs Shri Rameshwar Chotu Kushwaha Advocate - Arun K. Roy — 82/2019
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 12. Status: Respondents Evidence. Next hearing: 24th April 2026.
Ref IDA - Reference
CNR: MHLC040005392019
Next Hearing
24th April 2026
Filing Number
553/2019
Filing Date
10-06-2019
Registration No
82/2019
Registration Date
11-06-2019
Court
Labour Court,Thane
Judge
1-JUDGE, First Labour Court
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M/s.Sun Silk Mills and ors.5
Adv. Adv.P. N. Anaokar
Shri Ashok Baldiya
Adv. Adv.P. N. Anaokar
Smt.Manjula Ashok Baldiya
Adv. Adv.P. N. Anaokar
Shri Ramesh Baldiya
Adv. Adv.P. N. Anaokar
Smt.Ramila Ramesh Baldiya
Adv. Adv.P. N. Anaokar
Shri Sampat Jasrajji Baldiya
Adv. Adv.P. N. Anaokar
Respondent(s)
Shri Rameshwar Chotu Kushwaha Advocate - Arun K. Roy
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JUDGE, First Labour Court
Respondents Evidence
Respondents Evidence
Respondents Evidence
Respondents Evidence
Respondents Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Respondents Evidence |
| 09-01-2026 | Respondents Evidence |
| 10-12-2025 | Respondents Evidence |
| 28-11-2025 | Respondents Evidence |
| 14-11-2025 | Respondents Evidence |
Interim Orders
This document is a cross-examination record from the First Labour Court, Thane (Case No. IDA/82/2019), dated 04/04/2025, where the witness's testimony was extensively challenged. The witness admitted to filing false affidavits, lacking documentary evidence for key claims about employment relationships with Sun Silk Mills and Aparklene Fabrics, and denied several allegations made during cross-examination regarding contract work and worker payments. The cross-examination was completed with no re-examination, but no final order granting or dismissing any relief has been issued in this excerpt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document is a cross-examination record from the First Labour Court, Thane (Case No. IDA/82/2019), dated 04/04/2025, where the witness's testimony was extensively challenged. The witness admitted to filing false affidavits, lacking documentary evidence for key claims about employment relationships with Sun Silk Mills and Aparklene Fabrics, and denied several allegations made during cross-examination regarding contract work and worker payments. The cross-examination was completed with no re-examination, but no final order granting or dismissing any relief has been issued in this excerpt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts