M/s.Sun Silk Mills and Ors.5 vs Shri Umesh Yadunath Prasad Advocate - Arun K. Roy, A. K. Roy — 68/2019
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 12. Status: Cross Examination. Next hearing: 24th April 2026.
Ref IDA - Reference
CNR: MHLC040004152019
Next Hearing
24th April 2026
Filing Number
426/2019
Filing Date
25-04-2019
Registration No
68/2019
Registration Date
25-04-2019
Court
Labour Court,Thane
Judge
1-JUDGE, First Labour Court
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M/s.Sun Silk Mills and Ors.5
Adv. S P. Anaokar, S P. Anaokar
Shri Ashok Baldiya
Smt.Manjula Ashok Baldiya
Shri Ramesh Baldiya
Smt.Ramila Ramesh Baldiya
Shri Sampat Jasrajji Baldiya
Respondent(s)
Shri Umesh Yadunath Prasad Advocate - Arun K. Roy, A. K. Roy
Hearing History
Judge: 1-JUDGE, First Labour Court
Cross Examination
Cross Examination
Cross Examination
Cross Examination
Cross Examination
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Cross Examination |
| 09-01-2026 | Cross Examination |
| 10-12-2025 | Cross Examination |
| 28-11-2025 | Cross Examination |
| 14-11-2025 | Cross Examination |
Interim Orders
Summary: The First Labour Court, Thane allowed the application filed by M/s. Sunsilk Mills & Ors. and set aside the "no cross order" dated 30/06/2025 that prevented cross-examination of the second party (workman). The Court granted the first party an opportunity to cross-examine the workman on the next date of hearing, finding that allowing the application would not prejudice the second party but would prevent hardship to the first party and enable a decision on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The First Labour Court, Thane allowed the application filed by M/s. Sunsilk Mills & Ors. and set aside the "no cross order" dated 30/06/2025 that prevented cross-examination of the second party (workman). The Court granted the first party an opportunity to cross-examine the workman on the next date of hearing, finding that allowing the application would not prejudice the second party but would prevent hardship to the first party and enable a decision on merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts