Mr.Devram Bhua Sutar vs The Sub Regional Manager, and Ors.2 Advocate - Adv M Mishra — 31/2019
Case under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 Section 4. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 17th April 2026.
Appln.PGA - PGA
CNR: MHLC040003682019
Next Hearing
17th April 2026
Filing Number
378/2019
Filing Date
08-04-2019
Registration No
31/2019
Registration Date
08-04-2019
Court
Labour Court,Thane
Judge
3-JUDGE, Third Labour Court
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mr.Devram Bhua Sutar
Adv. T A Jadhav
Respondent(s)
The Sub Regional Manager, and Ors.2 Advocate - Adv M Mishra
Tha Rigional Manager
Managing Director
Hearing History
Judge: 3-JUDGE, Third Labour Court
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 13-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 16-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 29-12-2025 | Evidence |
| 08-12-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary: The Second Labour Court, Thane allowed the opponents' application (PGA No. 31 of 2019) to set aside the "evidence closure" order passed against them. The court found that while the opponents failed to file their written statement and adduce evidence without justification, it was in the interest of justice to decide the controversy on merit rather than technicalities. Accordingly, both the "no written statement" order and the evidence closure order were set aside, giving opponents an opportunity to contest the matter by filing their written statement and adducing evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Second Labour Court, Thane allowed the opponents' application (PGA No. 31 of 2019) to set aside the "evidence closure" order passed against them. The court found that while the opponents failed to file their written statement and adduce evidence without justification, it was in the interest of justice to decide the controversy on merit rather than technicalities. Accordingly, both the "no written statement" order and the evidence closure order were set aside, giving opponents an opportunity to contest the matter by filing their written statement and adducing evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts