Mr.Devram Bhua Sutar vs The Sub Regional Manager, and Ors.2 Advocate - Adv M Mishra — 31/2019
Case under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 Section 4. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 17th April 2026.
Appln.PGA - PGA
CNR: MHLC040003682019
Filing Number
378/2019
Filing Date
08-Apr-2019
Registration No
31/2019
Registration Date
08-Apr-2019
Court
Labour Court,Thane
Judge
3-Judge, Third Labour Court
Last updated 26-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Mr.Devram Bhua Sutar
Adv. T A Jadhav
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Sub Regional Manager, and Ors.2 Advocate - Adv M Mishra
-
2.Tha Rigional Manager
-
3.Managing Director
Case History
-
17-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
Evidence
Judge, Third Labour Court
-
13-Feb-2026
Evidence
Judge, Third Labour Court
-
16-Jan-2026
Evidence
Judge, Second Labour Court
-
29-Dec-2025
Evidence
Judge, Second Labour Court
-
08-Dec-2025
Evidence
Judge, Second Labour Court
-
17-Nov-2025
Order
Judge, Second Labour Court
-
27-Oct-2025
Compliance
Judge, Second Labour Court
-
15-Sep-2025
Compliance
Judge, Second Labour Court
-
18-Aug-2025
Order below ExhView PDF
-
18-Aug-2025
Order below ExhView PDF
Summary: The Second Labour Court, Thane allowed the opponents' application (PGA No. 31 of 2019) to set aside the "evidence closure" order passed against them. The court found that while the opponents failed to file their written statement and adduce evidence without justification, it was in the interest of justice to decide the controversy on merit rather than technicalities. Accordingly, both the "no written statement" order and the evidence closure order were set aside, giving opponents an opportunity to contest the matter by filing their written statement and adducing evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
18-Aug-2025
Compliance
Judge, Second Labour Court
-
11-Aug-2025
Hearing below Exh.
Judge, Second Labour Court
-
01-Aug-2025
Respondents Argument
Judge, Second Labour Court
-
28-Jul-2025
Respondents Argument
Judge, Second Labour Court
-
27-Jun-2025
Respondents Argument
Judge, Second Labour Court
-
07-May-2025
Respondents Argument
Judge, Second Labour Court
-
17-Apr-2025
Respondents Argument
Judge, Second Labour Court
-
19-Mar-2025
Respondents Argument
Judge, Second Labour Court
-
18-Mar-2025
Respondents Argument
Judge, Second Labour Court
-
21-Feb-2025
Respondents Argument
Judge, Second Labour Court
-
14-Feb-2025
Respondents Argument
Judge, Second Labour Court
-
27-Jan-2025
Respondents Argument
Judge, Second Labour Court
-
13-Jan-2025
Argument
Judge, Second Labour Court
-
23-Dec-2024
Order
Judge, Second Labour Court
-
13-Dec-2024
Respondents Evidence
Judge, Second Labour Court
-
04-Dec-2024
Respondents Evidence
Judge, Second Labour Court
-
29-Nov-2024
Evidence
Judge, Second Labour Court
-
16-Nov-2024
Say
Judge, Second Labour Court
-
30-Sep-2024
Say
Judge, Second Labour Court
-
09-Sep-2024
Order
Judge, Second Labour Court
-
19-Aug-2024
Evidence
Judge, Second Labour Court
-
22-Jul-2024
Evidence
Judge, Second Labour Court
-
10-Jun-2024
Ex-parte Evidence
Judge, Second Labour Court
-
01-Apr-2024
Ex-parte Evidence
Judge, Second Labour Court
-
11-Mar-2024
Order on Exh._________
Judge, Second Labour Court
-
26-Feb-2024
Order on Exh._________
Judge, Second Labour Court
-
12-Jan-2024
Reply
Judge, Second Labour Court
-
24-Nov-2023
Reply
Judge, Second Labour Court
-
13-Oct-2023
Reply
Judge, Second Labour Court
-
01-Sep-2023
Appearance
Judge, Second Labour Court
-
18-Jul-2023
Appearance
Judge, Second Labour Court
-
07-Jul-2023
Appearance
Judge, Second Labour Court
-
08-Jun-2023
Appearance
Judge, Second Labour Court
-
18-May-2023
Appearance
Judge, Second Labour Court
-
30-Mar-2023
Notice
Judge, Second Labour Court
-
13-Mar-2023
Order on Exh._________
Judge, Second Labour Court
-
13-Feb-2023
Written Statement
Judge, Second Labour Court
-
09-Jan-2023
Written Statement
Judge, Second Labour Court
-
19-Dec-2022
Written Statement
Judge, Second Labour Court
-
21-Nov-2022
Written Statement
Judge, Second Labour Court
-
31-Oct-2022
Written Statement
Judge, Second Labour Court
-
12-Sep-2022
Written Statement
Judge, Second Labour Court
-
18-Jul-2022
Written Statement
Judge, Second Labour Court
-
06-Jun-2022
Written Statement
Judge, Second Labour Court
-
18-Apr-2022
Written Statement
Judge, Second Labour Court
-
14-Mar-2022
Written Statement
Judge, Second Labour Court
-
07-Feb-2022
Written Statement
Judge, Second Labour Court
-
10-Jan-2022
Written Statement
Judge, Second Labour Court
-
29-Nov-2021
Written Statement
Judge, Second Labour Court
-
29-Oct-2021
Written Statement
Judge, Second Labour Court
-
17-Sep-2021
Written Statement
Judge, Second Labour Court
-
30-Aug-2021
Written Statement
Judge, Second Labour Court
-
26-Jul-2021
Written Statement
Judge, Second Labour Court
-
05-Jul-2021
Report
Judge, Second Labour Court
-
07-Jun-2021
Report
Judge, Second Labour Court
-
10-Mar-2021
Report
Judge, Second Labour Court
-
03-Feb-2021
Report
Judge, Second Labour Court
-
24-Dec-2020
Report
Judge, Second Labour Court
-
15-Oct-2020
Report
Judge, Second Labour Court
-
13-Aug-2020
Report
Judge, Second Labour Court
-
04-Jun-2020
Report
Judge, Second Labour Court
-
19-Mar-2020
Report
Judge, Second Labour Court
-
13-Feb-2020
Report
Judge, Second Labour Court
-
02-Jan-2020
Report
Judge, Second Labour Court
-
23-Dec-2019
Appearance
Judge, Second Labour Court
-
25-Nov-2019
Appearance
Judge, Second Labour Court
-
11-Oct-2019
Appearance
Judge, Second Labour Court
-
13-Sep-2019
Appearance
Judge, Second Labour Court
-
26-Jul-2019
Appearance
Judge, Second Labour Court
-
21-Jun-2019
Appearance
Judge, Second Labour Court
-
13-May-2019
Report
Judge, Second Labour Court
-
08-Apr-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-Apr-2019
Case filed
Registration No. 31/2019
Summary: The Second Labour Court, Thane allowed the opponents' application (PGA No. 31 of 2019) to set aside the "evidence closure" order passed against them. The court found that while the opponents failed to file their written statement and adduce evidence without justification, it was in the interest of justice to decide the controversy on merit rather than technicalities. Accordingly, both the "no written statement" order and the evidence closure order were set aside, giving opponents an opportunity to contest the matter by filing their written statement and adducing evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts