Rushikesh Kashirao Deshmukh vs The Secretary Ministry of Road Transport And Highway and 3 Advocate - Mundada Sanjaykumar R_DGP — 510/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7,(1). Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit
CNR: MHLA170032942023
Next Hearing
17th June 2026
Filing Number
658/2023
Filing Date
05-12-2016
Registration No
510/2023
Registration Date
05-12-2016
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Ausa
Judge
1-Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rushikesh Kashirao Deshmukh
Adv. Deshpande Sujeet Y
Respondent(s)
The Secretary Ministry of Road Transport And Highway and 3 Advocate - Mundada Sanjaykumar R_DGP
State of Maharashtra
Adv. Mundada Sanjaykumar R
The Land Acqu. Officer
Adv. Mundada Sanjaykumar R
Chand Shanur Shaikh
Adv. Pande Sanjay B
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 20-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 09-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 01-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 16-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Rushikesh Kashirao Deshmukh v. Secretary Ministry of Road Transport and Highway (510/2023) Outcome: The plaintiff's review application under Order XLVII Rule 1(B) of the Code of Civil Procedure was rejected by the Civil Judge on 30 April 2026. The court held that review provisions were not applicable, as the earlier order rejecting the Court Commissioner application had already been confirmed by the High Court's dismissal of the writ petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Rushikesh Kashirao Deshmukh v. Secretary Ministry of Road Transport and Highway (510/2023) Outcome: The plaintiff's review application under Order XLVII Rule 1(B) of the Code of Civil Procedure was rejected by the Civil Judge on 30 April 2026. The court held that review provisions were not applicable, as the earlier order rejecting the Court Commissioner application had already been confirmed by the High Court's dismissal of the writ petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts