State of Maharashtra Time Bound vs Venkuram Ashokrao Chilme Advocate - Karde Jeevan N — 134/2019

Case under Land Acquisition Act Section Us3H. Disposed: Contested--DECREED on 27th March 2026.

L.A.R. - Land Ref.

CNR: MHLA170020352023

Case disposed

Filing Number

3/2019

Filing Date

29-06-2019

Registration No

134/2019

Registration Date

29-06-2019

Court

Civil Court Senior Division , Ausa

Judge

1-Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa

Decision Date

27th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DECREED

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act Section Us3H

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra Time Bound

Adv. Deshpande Vithal V_DGP

The Competent Authority and Sub Divisional Officer Land Acquisition

Adv. Deshpande Vithal V_DGP3

Respondent(s)

Venkuram Ashokrao Chilme Advocate - Karde Jeevan N

Harischandra Gangaram Chilme

Adv. Pande Sanjay B

Ashok Gangaram Chilme

Adv. Nimburge Amol M

Kamalbai Ashok Chilme

Adv. Nimburge Amol M

Project Director

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa

27-03-2026

Disposed

25-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Ready

18-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Ready

16-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Ready

13-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Ready

Final Orders / Judgements

27-03-2026
Issues
27-03-2026
Copy of Judgment

SUMMARY In this land acquisition reference under the National Highways Act, 1956, the court determined entitlement to compensation for 1,700 square meters of agricultural land in survey No. 34/B, Budhoda acquired for National Highway No. 361. The court ruled that Harischandra Gangaram Chilme (Respondent No. 2) is entitled to the compensation amount, rejecting claims by Vyankuram Ashokrao Chilme (Respondent No. 1) and Ashok Gangaram Chilme (Respondent No. 3). The court found that documentary evidence, including registered sale deeds and gift deeds, established Harischandra's ownership of the eastern portion of the disputed land, and ordered disbursement of compensation to him within one month. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY In this land acquisition reference under the National Highways Act, 1956, the court determined entitlement to compensation for 1,700 square meters of agricultural land in survey No. 34/B, Budhoda acquired for National Highway No. 361. The court ruled that Harischandra Gangaram Chilme (Respondent No. 2) is entitled to the compensation amount, rejecting claims by Vyankuram Ashokrao Chilme (Respondent No. 1) and Ashok Gangaram Chilme (Respondent No. 3). The court found that documentary evidence, including registered sale deeds and gift deeds, established Harischandra's ownership of the eastern portion of the disputed land, and ordered disbursement of compensation to him within one month. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Senior Division , Ausa All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case