Waman Rama Bandgar vs Shivaji Raosaheb Patil Advocate - Shivalkar Mohan K. — 132/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7(1)(2). Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
Spl.C.S. - Spl.Civ.Suit
CNR: MHLA170020202023
Next Hearing
12th June 2026
Filing Number
227/2023
Filing Date
06-04-2023
Registration No
132/2023
Registration Date
06-04-2023
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Ausa
Judge
1-Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Waman Rama Bandgar
Adv. Patel Sirajuddin A
Respondent(s)
Shivaji Raosaheb Patil Advocate - Shivalkar Mohan K.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Arguments
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 09-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 13-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 09-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 23-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Special Civil Suit 132/2023 (Waman Bandgar v. Shivaji Patil) The defendant's application under Order 26 Rule 1 CPC for appointment of a Court Commissioner to record his examination-in-chief and cross-examination due to old age was rejected. The court found the application lacked supporting documentary evidence such as medical reports or certificates to establish the defendant's inability to appear in court, and noted that witness examination can be conducted via video conferencing under Supreme Court guidelines. Order passed on 23.02.2026 by the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Ausa. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Special Civil Suit 132/2023 (Waman Bandgar v. Shivaji Patil) The defendant's application under Order 26 Rule 1 CPC for appointment of a Court Commissioner to record his examination-in-chief and cross-examination due to old age was rejected. The court found the application lacked supporting documentary evidence such as medical reports or certificates to establish the defendant's inability to appear in court, and noted that witness examination can be conducted via video conferencing under Supreme Court guidelines. Order passed on 23.02.2026 by the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Ausa. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts