Anis Fakir Ahmad Shaikh vs Hanumant Vishwanath More and 1 Advocate - Kaldate Prakash N — 57/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7. Status: Filing of Say on Exh___Ready. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.
Spl.C.S. - Spl.Civ.Suit
CNR: MHLA170009612023
Next Hearing
10th June 2026
Filing Number
1508/2023
Filing Date
08-03-2021
Registration No
57/2023
Registration Date
08-03-2021
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Ausa
Judge
1-Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Anis Fakir Ahmad Shaikh
Adv. Shaikh Mujeeb M
Respondent(s)
Hanumant Vishwanath More and 1 Advocate - Kaldate Prakash N
Vishal Vishwanath More
Adv. Kaldate Prakash N
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-05-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Ready |
| 28-04-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Ready |
| 09-04-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Ready |
| 13-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Ready |
| 02-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Ready |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 57/2023 - Anis Fakir Ahmad Shaikh v. Hanumant Vishwanath More & Others Outcome: Appeal Allowed (Partially). The court set aside a 2019 decree regarding a land sale transaction worth ₹32,51,000, finding that the petitioner's affidavit evidence was false and contradictory. The court determined the respondents fraudulently obtained the decree and ordered the property transaction void. The court directed restoration of the land to the petitioner and imposed liability for damages of ₹8,00,000 against the respondents for breach of a mortgage agreement and failure to comply with court orders regarding property transfer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 57/2023 - Anis Fakir Ahmad Shaikh v. Hanumant Vishwanath More & Others Outcome: Appeal Allowed (Partially). The court set aside a 2019 decree regarding a land sale transaction worth ₹32,51,000, finding that the petitioner's affidavit evidence was false and contradictory. The court determined the respondents fraudulently obtained the decree and ordered the property transaction void. The court directed restoration of the land to the petitioner and imposed liability for damages of ₹8,00,000 against the respondents for breach of a mortgage agreement and failure to comply with court orders regarding property transfer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts