Sangita Navnath Bombade vs Anil Irappa Bombade Advocate - Fattepurkar Ajinkya A — 23/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order7Rule1and2. Status: Awaiting Summons. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.

Spl.C.S. - Spl.Civ.Suit

CNR: MHLA170004702025

Awaiting Summons

Next Hearing

18th June 2026

e-Filing Number

19-07-2025

Filing Number

476/2025

Filing Date

19-07-2025

Registration No

23/2025

Registration Date

19-07-2025

Court

Civil Court Senior Division , Ausa

Judge

1-Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Order7Rule1and2

Petitioner(s)

Sangita Navnath Bombade

Adv. Sayed Khajazulfekhar M

Shankar Nivnath Bombade

Adv. Sayed Khajazulfekhar M

Nita Vitthal Pasme

Adv. Sayed Khajazulfekhar M

Respondent(s)

Anil Irappa Bombade Advocate - Fattepurkar Ajinkya A

Savitribai Anil Bombade

Adv. Fattepurkar Ajinkya A

Narayan Anil Bombade

Adv. Fattepurkar Ajinkya A

Pandurang Anil Bombade

Adv. Fattepurkar Ajinkya A

Vikas Dnyanoba Matlakute

Ganesh Dnyanoba Matlakute

Madhubala Nath Badgire

National Highway Authority of India

Competent Authority Land Acquisition Officer and Sub Divisional Officer, Ausa-Renapur

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa

24-04-2026

Awaiting Summons

06-04-2026

Awaiting Summons

13-03-2026

Awaiting Summons

25-02-2026

Awaiting Summons

12-02-2026

Awaiting Summons

Interim Orders

06-04-2026
Order on Exhibit

In Special Civil Suit No. 23/2025, the Civil Judge, Senior Division at Ausa ordered on 6th April 2026 that the suit shall proceed ex-parte against Defendant No. 9, as he failed to appear before the court despite valid service of summons as evidenced by the bailiff report. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

In Special Civil Suit No. 23/2025, the Civil Judge, Senior Division at Ausa ordered on 6th April 2026 that the suit shall proceed ex-parte against Defendant No. 9, as he failed to appear before the court despite valid service of summons as evidenced by the bailiff report. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Senior Division , Ausa All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case