Narayandas Raghunathdas Jaju Through Nilesh Narayandas Jaju vs State of Maharashtra Advocate - Girwalkar Shivkumar M_DGP — 378/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7R1. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.

R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit

CNR: MHLA170001362023

Evidence Part Heard

Next Hearing

23rd June 2026

Filing Number

87/2023

Filing Date

13-03-2019

Registration No

378/2023

Registration Date

13-03-2019

Court

Civil Court Senior Division , Ausa

Judge

1-Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section O7R1

Petitioner(s)

Narayandas Raghunathdas Jaju Through Nilesh Narayandas Jaju

Adv. Tapadia Satyanarayan V

Respondent(s)

State of Maharashtra Advocate - Girwalkar Shivkumar M_DGP

The Dist Supt. of land Record

Adv. Girwalkar Shivkumar M_DGP

Deputy Supt. of land Record

Adv. Girwalkar Shivkumar M_DGP

Cadastral Superory

Adv. Girwalkar Shivkumar M_DGP

Ratanlal Gangaram Jaju

Adv. Shinde Pramod L

Shriniwas Ratanlal Jaju

Adv. Shinde Pramod L

Shardabai Ratanlal Jaju

Adv. Shinde Pramod L

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa

20-04-2026

Evidence Part Heard

01-04-2026

Evidence Part Heard

13-03-2026

Evidence Part Heard

18-02-2026

Evidence Part Heard

28-01-2026

Evidence Part Heard

Interim Orders

28-02-2025
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: RCS 378/2023 The court allowed defendants 7/3 to 7/6's application to file their written statement despite missing the statutory 90-day deadline. The court found that as legal heirs of deceased defendant 7 and parties impleaded in this perpetual injunction suit, they have the right to present their defence under the Civil Procedure Code. However, the permission was granted subject to payment of Rs. 1,000 cost to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: RCS 378/2023 The court allowed defendants 7/3 to 7/6's application to file their written statement despite missing the statutory 90-day deadline. The court found that as legal heirs of deceased defendant 7 and parties impleaded in this perpetual injunction suit, they have the right to present their defence under the Civil Procedure Code. However, the permission was granted subject to payment of Rs. 1,000 cost to the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Senior Division , Ausa All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case