Venkuram ashokrao Chilme and other 3 Time Bound vs Harishchandra Gangaram Chilme and other 5 Advocate - Pande Sanjay B — 367/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7R1. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 27th March 2026.
R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit
CNR: MHLA170001022023
Filing Number
25/2023
Filing Date
12-10-2018
Registration No
367/2023
Registration Date
12-10-2018
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Ausa
Judge
1-Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa
Decision Date
27th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Venkuram ashokrao Chilme and other 3 Time Bound
Adv. Karde Jeevan N
Jyoti Gunwant Aalgule
Adv. Karde Jeevan N
Archana Govind chame
Adv. Karde Jeevan N
Suwarna vidyasagar Mekhale
Adv. Karde Jeevan N
Respondent(s)
Harishchandra Gangaram Chilme and other 5 Advocate - Pande Sanjay B
Angad Gangaram Chilme
Adv. Pande Sanjay B
Ashok Gangaram Chilme
Adv. Nimburge Amol M
Kamalbai Ashok Chilme
Adv. Nimburge Amol M
Authoriesed Officer
Project director
Adv. Sakolkar Virendra T
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa
Disposed
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 25-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
| 18-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
| 16-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
| 13-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 367/2023 Court: Civil Judge, Senior Division, Ausa, District Latur Decided: 27 March 2026 Decision: The suit was dismissed. The court found that defendant No. 1 (Harischandra) is the rightful owner of the disputed eastern portion of land in survey No. 34/B and rejected the plaintiffs' claims for declaration of a relinquishment deed as void and for compensation from land acquisition. The court determined that the plaintiffs failed to prove ownership rights to the acquired land. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: 367/2023 Court: Civil Judge, Senior Division, Ausa, District Latur Decided: 27 March 2026 Decision: The suit was dismissed. The court found that defendant No. 1 (Harischandra) is the rightful owner of the disputed eastern portion of land in survey No. 34/B and rejected the plaintiffs' claims for declaration of a relinquishment deed as void and for compensation from land acquisition. The court determined that the plaintiffs failed to prove ownership rights to the acquired land. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts