Sharif Khan S/o Hasan Khan Pathan and other 01 vs Akhil S/o Mohammad Sharif Shaikh Advocate - Sayed Khajazulfekhar M — 12/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order 7, Rule 1. Status: Argument on Exh.____Ready. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.

Argument on Exh.____Ready Next hearing 17-Jun-2026 this date has passed

Spl.C.S. - Spl.Civ.Suit

CNR: MHLA170000472024

e-Filing Number

30-01-2024

Filing Number

43/2024

Filing Date

31-Jan-2024

Registration No

12/2024

Registration Date

31-Jan-2024

Court

Civil Court Senior Division , Ausa

Judge

1-Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Order 7, Rule 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sharif Khan S/o Hasan Khan Pathan and other 01

    Adv. Pathan Yunuskhan I

  2. 2.Wajahat S/o Osman Ali Sayyed

    Adv. Pathan Yunuskhan I

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Akhil S/o Mohammad Sharif Shaikh Advocate - Sayed Khajazulfekhar M

Case History

  1. 17-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa

  4. 26-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa

  5. 14-Feb-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa

  6. 12-Jan-2026

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa

  7. 01-Dec-2025

    List of Witness

    Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa

  8. 19-Nov-2025

    Issues

    Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa

  9. 17-Oct-2025

    Issues

    Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa

  10. 14-Oct-2025

    Issues

    Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa

  11. 25-Sep-2025

    Issues

    Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa

  12. 29-Aug-2025

    Amended Plaint

    Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa

  13. 18-Aug-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case 12/2024 Summary: The court allowed the plaintiffs' application to amend the plaint under Order VI Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The plaintiffs sought to correct typographical errors in paragraph 1, changing "the defendant is owner and possessor of agricultural land" to "the defendant has agreed to sale the suit property to plaintiffs on 17/05/2023" and replacing "is" with "was." The court found the amendments would not prejudice the defendant or alter the suit's nature, and granted permission to make these corrections within 14 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  14. 18-Aug-2025

    Amended Plaint

    Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa

  15. 13-Aug-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  16. 13-Aug-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  17. 13-Aug-2025

    Order on Exh

    Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa

  18. 04-Aug-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa

  19. 25-Jul-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa

  20. 22-Jul-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa

  21. 12-Jun-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa

  22. 23-Apr-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa

  23. 15-Apr-2025

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa

  24. 02-Apr-2025

    Issues

    Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa

  25. 15-Mar-2025

    Issues

    Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa

  26. 13-Feb-2025

    Order on T.I.View PDF

  27. 13-Feb-2025

    Issues

    Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa

  28. 11-Feb-2025

    Order on Exh

    Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa

  29. 04-Feb-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa

  30. 29-Jan-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa

  31. 13-Jan-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa

  32. 09-Dec-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa

  33. 27-Nov-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa

  34. 23-Nov-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa

  35. 13-Nov-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa

  36. 06-Nov-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa

  37. 19-Oct-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa

  38. 01-Oct-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa

  39. 18-Sep-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa

  40. 27-Aug-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa

  41. 23-Jul-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa

  42. 16-Jul-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa

  43. 13-Jun-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa

  44. 04-May-2024

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa

  45. 16-Apr-2024

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa

  46. 28-Mar-2024

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa

  47. 01-Mar-2024

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa

  48. 22-Feb-2024

    W.S. and Say

    Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa

  49. 13-Feb-2024

    Awaiting Notice

    Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa

  50. 31-Jan-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  51. 31-Jan-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 12/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case 12/2024 Summary: The court allowed the plaintiffs' application to amend the plaint under Order VI Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The plaintiffs sought to correct typographical errors in paragraph 1, changing "the defendant is owner and possessor of agricultural land" to "the defendant has agreed to sale the suit property to plaintiffs on 17/05/2023" and replacing "is" with "was." The court found the amendments would not prejudice the defendant or alter the suit's nature, and granted permission to make these corrections within 14 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case