Sharif Khan S/o Hasan Khan Pathan and other 01 vs Akhil S/o Mohammad Sharif Shaikh Advocate - Sayed Khajazulfekhar M — 12/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Order 7, Rule 1. Status: Argument on Exh.____Ready. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
Spl.C.S. - Spl.Civ.Suit
CNR: MHLA170000472024
Next Hearing
17th June 2026
e-Filing Number
30-01-2024
Filing Number
43/2024
Filing Date
31-01-2024
Registration No
12/2024
Registration Date
31-01-2024
Court
Civil Court Senior Division , Ausa
Judge
1-Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sharif Khan S/o Hasan Khan Pathan and other 01
Adv. Pathan Yunuskhan I
Wajahat S/o Osman Ali Sayyed
Adv. Pathan Yunuskhan I
Respondent(s)
Akhil S/o Mohammad Sharif Shaikh Advocate - Sayed Khajazulfekhar M
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Senior Division Ausa
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
| 13-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
| 26-02-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
| 14-02-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Ready |
| 12-01-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Ready |
Interim Orders
Case 12/2024 Summary: The court allowed the plaintiffs' application to amend the plaint under Order VI Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The plaintiffs sought to correct typographical errors in paragraph 1, changing "the defendant is owner and possessor of agricultural land" to "the defendant has agreed to sale the suit property to plaintiffs on 17/05/2023" and replacing "is" with "was." The court found the amendments would not prejudice the defendant or alter the suit's nature, and granted permission to make these corrections within 14 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 12/2024 Summary: The court allowed the plaintiffs' application to amend the plaint under Order VI Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The plaintiffs sought to correct typographical errors in paragraph 1, changing "the defendant is owner and possessor of agricultural land" to "the defendant has agreed to sale the suit property to plaintiffs on 17/05/2023" and replacing "is" with "was." The court found the amendments would not prejudice the defendant or alter the suit's nature, and granted permission to make these corrections within 14 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts