Balaji Govindrao Murale and others 2 vs Ram Hanmantrao Murale Advocate - Patil Mahesh B — 72/2016
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7. Status: Compliance. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHLA160009992015
Next Hearing
12th June 2026
Filing Number
197/2016
Filing Date
10-08-2016
Registration No
72/2016
Registration Date
10-08-2016
Court
Civil Court Junior Division, Deoni
Judge
1-CJJD and JMFC Deoni
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Balaji Govindrao Murale and others 2
Adv. Patil Balaji V
Sou Prabhawati Balaji Murale
Adv. Bhalke Basweshwar N
Laxmi Govind Murale
Adv. Bhalke Basweshwar N
Respondent(s)
Ram Hanmantrao Murale Advocate - Patil Mahesh B
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CJJD and JMFC Deoni
Compliance
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-04-2026 | Compliance |
| 10-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
| 13-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
| 05-03-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Ready |
| 17-02-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case Summary - Civil Suit No. 72/2016 The court allowed the defendants' application to set aside the previous "No Written Statement" order and permitted them to file a written statement in this property ownership suit. The defendants (legal heirs who substituted after original defendant's death) were granted this opportunity subject to paying Rs. 1,000 costs to the plaintiff, with the condition that failure to pay by the next date will result in automatic cancellation of the order. Both parties were directed to expedite proceedings without seeking unnecessary adjournments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary - Civil Suit No. 72/2016 The court allowed the defendants' application to set aside the previous "No Written Statement" order and permitted them to file a written statement in this property ownership suit. The defendants (legal heirs who substituted after original defendant's death) were granted this opportunity subject to paying Rs. 1,000 costs to the plaintiff, with the condition that failure to pay by the next date will result in automatic cancellation of the order. Both parties were directed to expedite proceedings without seeking unnecessary adjournments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts