Madhav Shivaji Kavthale vs The State of Maharashtra — 52/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 26th May 2026.

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHLA160008402025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

30-10-2025

Filing Number

463/2025

Filing Date

04-11-2025

Registration No

52/2025

Registration Date

07-11-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division, Deoni

Judge

1-CJJD and JMFC Deoni

Decision Date

26th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

FIR Details

FIR Number

250

Police Station

Police Station Deoni

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

Madhav Shivaji Kavthale

Adv. Sasatte Balu M

Respondent(s)

The State of Maharashtra

Hearing History

Judge: 1-CJJD and JMFC Deoni

26-05-2026

Disposed

13-05-2026

Awaiting Notice

05-05-2026

Awaiting Notice

23-04-2026

Notice_Unready

16-04-2026

Notice_Unready

Final Orders / Judgements

26-05-2026
Order on Exhibit

The court allowed Madhav Shivaji Kavthale's application for interim custody of his seized Bajaj RE-CNG auto (registration MH-24-AT-7983), finding him to be the registered owner with valid legal claim. The vehicle, seized in crime No. 250/2025, was returned to the applicant upon furnishing an indemnity bond of Rs. 3,00,000, with conditions that he cannot alter or dispose of the vehicle, must produce it when ordered, and must provide photographs of the vehicle for record. The court reasoned that police custody posed risk of deterioration without investigation necessity, and imposed conditions sufficient to ensure vehicle availability for trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed Madhav Shivaji Kavthale's application for interim custody of his seized Bajaj RE-CNG auto (registration MH-24-AT-7983), finding him to be the registered owner with valid legal claim. The vehicle, seized in crime No. 250/2025, was returned to the applicant upon furnishing an indemnity bond of Rs. 3,00,000, with conditions that he cannot alter or dispose of the vehicle, must produce it when ordered, and must provide photographs of the vehicle for record. The court reasoned that police custody posed risk of deterioration without investigation necessity, and imposed conditions sufficient to ensure vehicle availability for trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division, Deoni All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case