The State of Maharashtra vs Mangesh Jindas Ekdare Advocate - Patil Mahesh B — 86/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 326,324,120(b)294,323,506,34. Status: Awaiting Muddemal. Next hearing: 23rd July 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHLA160008222022
Next Hearing
23rd July 2026
Filing Number
296/2022
Filing Date
29-07-2022
Registration No
86/2022
Registration Date
29-07-2022
Court
Civil Court Junior Division, Deoni
Judge
1-CJJD and JMFC Deoni
FIR Details
FIR Number
151
Police Station
Police Station Deoni
Year
2022
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Mangesh Jindas Ekdare Advocate - Patil Mahesh B
Shailesh Jidans Ekdare
Mangesh Gurunath Patri
Ashok Mohanrao Ekdare
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CJJD and JMFC Deoni
Awaiting Muddemal
Awaiting Muddemal
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-05-2026 | Awaiting Muddemal |
| 21-04-2026 | Awaiting Muddemal |
| 27-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 13-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 04-02-2026 | Hearing |
Interim Orders
Case Summary - 86/2022 The court examined the chargesheet filed against the accused under IPC sections 326, 324, 294, 506, 323, 120B, and 34. The court found that while the elements of IPC section 120-A (criminal conspiracy) were established, section 120-B could not be made out as the conspiracy itself was not proven. Regarding the common intention under IPC section 34, though it was established, it did not constitute criminal conspiracy. Consequently, the accused were convicted under the applicable sections, with the order pronounced in open court on July 15, 2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary - 86/2022 The court examined the chargesheet filed against the accused under IPC sections 326, 324, 294, 506, 323, 120B, and 34. The court found that while the elements of IPC section 120-A (criminal conspiracy) were established, section 120-B could not be made out as the conspiracy itself was not proven. Regarding the common intention under IPC section 34, though it was established, it did not constitute criminal conspiracy. Consequently, the accused were convicted under the applicable sections, with the order pronounced in open court on July 15, 2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts