The State of Maharashtra vs Mangesh Jindas Ekdare Advocate - Patil Mahesh B — 86/2022

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 326,324,120(b)294,323,506,34. Status: Awaiting Muddemal. Next hearing: 23rd July 2026.

Awaiting Muddemal Next hearing 23-Jul-2026 this date has passed

R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case

CNR: MHLA160008222022

Filing Number

296/2022

Filing Date

29-Jul-2022

Registration No

86/2022

Registration Date

29-Jul-2022

Court

Civil Court Junior Division, Deoni

Judge

1-Cjjd and JMFC Deoni

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

151

Police Station

Police Station Deoni

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 326,324,120(b)294,323,506,34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State of Maharashtra

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Mangesh Jindas Ekdare Advocate - Patil Mahesh B

  2. 2.Shailesh Jidans Ekdare

  3. 3.Mangesh Gurunath Patri

  4. 4.Ashok Mohanrao Ekdare

Case History

  1. 23-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 30-May-2026

    Awaiting Muddemal

    Cjjd and JMFC Deoni

  3. 21-Apr-2026

    Awaiting Muddemal

    Cjjd and JMFC Deoni

  4. 27-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Deoni

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Deoni

  6. 04-Feb-2026

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Deoni

  7. 24-Dec-2025

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Deoni

  8. 19-Nov-2025

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Deoni

  9. 28-Oct-2025

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Deoni

  10. 02-Sep-2025

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Deoni

  11. 15-Jul-2025

    ChargeView PDF

  12. 15-Jul-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary - 86/2022 The court examined the chargesheet filed against the accused under IPC sections 326, 324, 294, 506, 323, 120B, and 34. The court found that while the elements of IPC section 120-A (criminal conspiracy) were established, section 120-B could not be made out as the conspiracy itself was not proven. Regarding the common intention under IPC section 34, though it was established, it did not constitute criminal conspiracy. Consequently, the accused were convicted under the applicable sections, with the order pronounced in open court on July 15, 2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  13. 15-Jul-2025

    Hearing

    Cjjd and JMFC Deoni

  14. 24-Apr-2025

    Appearance

    Cjjd and JMFC Deoni

  15. 02-Apr-2025

    Appearance

    Cjjd and JMFC Deoni

  16. 27-Feb-2025

    Summons_Ready

    Cjjd and JMFC Deoni

  17. 21-Jan-2025

    Summons_Ready

    Cjjd and JMFC Deoni

  18. 20-Dec-2024

    Summons_Ready

    Cjjd and JMFC Deoni

  19. 22-Nov-2024

    Appearance

    Cjjd and JMFC Deoni

  20. 18-Oct-2024

    Appearance

    Cjjd and JMFC Deoni

  21. 26-Sep-2024

    Appearance

    Cjjd and JMFC Deoni

  22. 20-Aug-2024

    Appearance

    Cjjd and JMFC Deoni

  23. 23-Jul-2024

    Appearance

    Cjjd and JMFC Deoni

  24. 20-Jun-2024

    Appearance

    Cjjd and JMFC Deoni

  25. 27-May-2024

    Appearance

    Cjjd and JMFC Deoni

  26. 22-Mar-2024

    Appearance

    Cjjd and JMFC Deoni

  27. 13-Feb-2024

    Appearance

    Cjjd and JMFC Deoni

  28. 17-Jan-2024

    Appearance

    Cjjd and JMFC Deoni

  29. 01-Dec-2023

    Appearance

    Cjjd and JMFC Deoni

  30. 20-Oct-2023

    Appearance

    Cjjd and JMFC Deoni

  31. 15-Sep-2023

    Appearance

    Cjjd and JMFC Deoni

  32. 07-Aug-2023

    Appearance

    Cjjd and JMFC Deoni

  33. 23-May-2023

    Appearance

    Cjjd and JMFC Deoni

  34. 03-Apr-2023

    Appearance

    Cjjd and JMFC Deoni

  35. 01-Mar-2023

    Appearance

    Cjjd and JMFC Deoni

  36. 13-Jan-2023

    Appearance

    Cjjd and JMFC Deoni

  37. 14-Oct-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  38. 29-Jul-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 86/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary - 86/2022 The court examined the chargesheet filed against the accused under IPC sections 326, 324, 294, 506, 323, 120B, and 34. The court found that while the elements of IPC section 120-A (criminal conspiracy) were established, section 120-B could not be made out as the conspiracy itself was not proven. Regarding the common intention under IPC section 34, though it was established, it did not constitute criminal conspiracy. Consequently, the accused were convicted under the applicable sections, with the order pronounced in open court on July 15, 2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case