The State of Maharashtra vs Digambar Dnyanoba Dhanegave — 206/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHLA160006322025

Filing Number

348/2025

Filing Date

29-Jul-2025

Registration No

206/2025

Registration Date

29-Jul-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division, Deoni

Judge

1-Cjjd and JMFC Deoni

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

167

Police Station

Police Station Deoni

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State of Maharashtra

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Digambar Dnyanoba Dhanegave

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case 206/2025 Summary: The court closed a criminal case under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949 (Section 65-E) filed on 29/07/2025 against respondent Digambar Dnyanoba Dhanegave. Due to lack of progress and inability to secure the accused's presence despite police efforts, the court found insufficient evidence to proceed. The case was ordered closed under CrPC Section 281 with the accused discharged, and the seized materials were ordered destroyed as per procedure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Cjjd and JMFC Deoni

  4. 08-Jan-2026

    Appearance

    Cjjd and JMFC Deoni

  5. 17-Nov-2025

    Appearance

    Cjjd and JMFC Deoni

  6. 29-Sep-2025

    Appearance

    Cjjd and JMFC Deoni

  7. 01-Aug-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 29-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 206/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case 206/2025 Summary: The court closed a criminal case under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949 (Section 65-E) filed on 29/07/2025 against respondent Digambar Dnyanoba Dhanegave. Due to lack of progress and inability to secure the accused's presence despite police efforts, the court found insufficient evidence to proceed. The case was ordered closed under CrPC Section 281 with the accused discharged, and the seized materials were ordered destroyed as per procedure. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case