The State of Maharashtra vs Vikas Shivraj Indale — 192/2025
Case under The Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products (Packaging and Labelling) Rules Section 6(b),24. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 09th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHLA160006112025
Filing Number
333/2025
Filing Date
18-07-2025
Registration No
192/2025
Registration Date
18-07-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division, Deoni
Judge
1-CJJD and JMFC Deoni
Decision Date
09th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING
FIR Details
FIR Number
230
Police Station
Police Station Deoni
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Vikas Shivraj Indale
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CJJD and JMFC Deoni
Disposed
N.B.W._Unready
N.B.W._Unready
Verification
Verification
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | N.B.W._Unready |
| 17-01-2026 | N.B.W._Unready |
| 26-12-2025 | Verification |
| 31-10-2025 | Verification |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Vikas Shivraj Indale (192/2025) Vikas Shivraj Indale was convicted for selling tobacco products (Gaychap Tobacco, Suryachap Tobacco, and Bristol Cigarettes) within 100 yards of a school on 11/07/2025, violating the Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products Act, 2003. The accused pleaded guilty after being informed of charges and consequences. The court sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 200 (with 2 days simple imprisonment in default) and ordered destruction of the seized tobacco products after the appeal period, considering his submission as a poor sole earning member of his family. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Vikas Shivraj Indale (192/2025) Vikas Shivraj Indale was convicted for selling tobacco products (Gaychap Tobacco, Suryachap Tobacco, and Bristol Cigarettes) within 100 yards of a school on 11/07/2025, violating the Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products Act, 2003. The accused pleaded guilty after being informed of charges and consequences. The court sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 200 (with 2 days simple imprisonment in default) and ordered destruction of the seized tobacco products after the appeal period, considering his submission as a poor sole earning member of his family. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts