The State of Maharashtra vs Shashikant Krusnaji Choudhari — 150/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHLA160005402024
Filing Number
255/2024
Filing Date
09-Aug-2024
Registration No
150/2024
Registration Date
09-Aug-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division, Deoni
Judge
1-Cjjd and JMFC Deoni
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
143
Police Station
excise
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.The State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Shashikant Krusnaji Choudhari
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case 150/2024 Summary The court acquitted respondent Shashikant Krusnaji Choudhari of charges under Section 65-E of the Maharashtra Excise Act, 1949, citing lack of progress in the investigation and insufficient evidence presented by the prosecution. The court found that the investigation had stalled since the case was filed on 07/08/2024, the accused was not properly informed, and the prosecution failed to establish its case, warranting the accused's acquittal under Section 281 of the Indian Penal Code. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
Cjjd and JMFC Deoni
-
26-Feb-2026
Appearance
Cjjd and JMFC Deoni
-
23-Dec-2025
Appearance
Cjjd and JMFC Deoni
-
30-Oct-2025
Appearance
Cjjd and JMFC Deoni
-
08-Sep-2025
Appearance
Cjjd and JMFC Deoni
-
31-Jul-2025
Appearance
Cjjd and JMFC Deoni
-
26-May-2025
Appearance
Cjjd and JMFC Deoni
-
17-Mar-2025
Appearance
Cjjd and JMFC Deoni
-
21-Dec-2024
Appearance
Cjjd and JMFC Deoni
-
30-Sep-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Aug-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 150/2024
Case 150/2024 Summary The court acquitted respondent Shashikant Krusnaji Choudhari of charges under Section 65-E of the Maharashtra Excise Act, 1949, citing lack of progress in the investigation and insufficient evidence presented by the prosecution. The court found that the investigation had stalled since the case was filed on 07/08/2024, the accused was not properly informed, and the prosecution failed to establish its case, warranting the accused's acquittal under Section 281 of the Indian Penal Code. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts