The State of Maharashtra vs Vyankat Kashinath Biradar — 149/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHLA160005392024
Filing Number
254/2024
Filing Date
09-Aug-2024
Registration No
149/2024
Registration Date
09-Aug-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division, Deoni
Judge
1-Cjjd and JMFC Deoni
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
130
Police Station
excise
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.The State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Vyankat Kashinath Biradar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
Order on Exhibit
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Vyankat Kashinath Biradar (149/2024) The court acquitted the accused Vyankat Kashinath Biradar of charges under the Maharashtra Liquor Act, 1949 Section 65-E due to lack of progress in the investigation and insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to establish a prima facie case, and no credible evidence was produced to support the allegations. The case was disposed of under CrPC Section 281, and the seized materials were ordered destroyed per regulations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
Cjjd and JMFC Deoni
-
26-Feb-2026
Appearance
Cjjd and JMFC Deoni
-
23-Dec-2025
Appearance
Cjjd and JMFC Deoni
-
30-Oct-2025
Appearance
Cjjd and JMFC Deoni
-
08-Sep-2025
Appearance
Cjjd and JMFC Deoni
-
31-Jul-2025
Appearance
Cjjd and JMFC Deoni
-
26-May-2025
Appearance
Cjjd and JMFC Deoni
-
17-Mar-2025
Appearance
Cjjd and JMFC Deoni
-
21-Dec-2024
Appearance
Cjjd and JMFC Deoni
-
30-Sep-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Aug-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 149/2024
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Vyankat Kashinath Biradar (149/2024) The court acquitted the accused Vyankat Kashinath Biradar of charges under the Maharashtra Liquor Act, 1949 Section 65-E due to lack of progress in the investigation and insufficient evidence. The prosecution failed to establish a prima facie case, and no credible evidence was produced to support the allegations. The case was disposed of under CrPC Section 281, and the seized materials were ordered destroyed per regulations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts