The State of Maharashtra vs Biradar Virsheti Kusnure — 148/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHLA160005382024
Filing Number
253/2024
Filing Date
09-Aug-2024
Registration No
148/2024
Registration Date
09-Aug-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division, Deoni
Judge
1-Cjjd and JMFC Deoni
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
226
Police Station
Police Station Deoni
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.The State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Biradar Virsheti Kusnure
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary of Case 148/2024 The State of Maharashtra v. Biradar Virsheti Kusnure - The court closed a case registered under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949, Section 65-E (dated 07/08/2024) due to lack of progress and inability to serve the accused with summons. The court found insufficient evidence and determined that closure under CrPC Section 281 was appropriate, thereby acquitting the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
Cjjd and JMFC Deoni
-
26-Feb-2026
Appearance
Cjjd and JMFC Deoni
-
23-Dec-2025
Appearance
Cjjd and JMFC Deoni
-
30-Oct-2025
Appearance
Cjjd and JMFC Deoni
-
08-Sep-2025
Appearance
Cjjd and JMFC Deoni
-
31-Jul-2025
Appearance
Cjjd and JMFC Deoni
-
26-May-2025
Appearance
Cjjd and JMFC Deoni
-
17-Mar-2025
Appearance
Cjjd and JMFC Deoni
-
21-Dec-2024
Appearance
Cjjd and JMFC Deoni
-
30-Sep-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Aug-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 148/2024
Summary of Case 148/2024 The State of Maharashtra v. Biradar Virsheti Kusnure - The court closed a case registered under the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949, Section 65-E (dated 07/08/2024) due to lack of progress and inability to serve the accused with summons. The court found insufficient evidence and determined that closure under CrPC Section 281 was appropriate, thereby acquitting the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts