The State of Maharashtra vs Amardip Kishanrao Biradar — 147/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHLA160005372024
Filing Number
252/2024
Filing Date
09-Aug-2024
Registration No
147/2024
Registration Date
09-Aug-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division, Deoni
Judge
1-Cjjd and JMFC Deoni
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
235
Police Station
Police Station Deoni
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.The State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Amardip Kishanrao Biradar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
Order on Exhibit
The court acquitted respondent Amardip Kishanrao Biradar in a case under the Maharashtra Liquor Act, 1949, Section 65-E, finding that the investigation had stalled without progress since the FIR was filed on 07/08/2024, the accused could not be summoned, and the prosecution's case could not be established. The court applied CrPC Section 281 to close the case and ordered the destruction of seized materials per regulations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
Cjjd and JMFC Deoni
-
26-Feb-2026
Appearance
Cjjd and JMFC Deoni
-
23-Dec-2025
Appearance
Cjjd and JMFC Deoni
-
30-Oct-2025
Appearance
Cjjd and JMFC Deoni
-
08-Sep-2025
Appearance
Cjjd and JMFC Deoni
-
31-Jul-2025
Appearance
Cjjd and JMFC Deoni
-
26-May-2025
Appearance
Cjjd and JMFC Deoni
-
17-Mar-2025
Appearance
Cjjd and JMFC Deoni
-
21-Dec-2024
Appearance
Cjjd and JMFC Deoni
-
30-Sep-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Aug-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 147/2024
The court acquitted respondent Amardip Kishanrao Biradar in a case under the Maharashtra Liquor Act, 1949, Section 65-E, finding that the investigation had stalled without progress since the FIR was filed on 07/08/2024, the accused could not be summoned, and the prosecution's case could not be established. The court applied CrPC Section 281 to close the case and ordered the destruction of seized materials per regulations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts