The State of Maharashtra vs Santosh Mohan Konale — 146/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHLA160005362024
Filing Number
251/2024
Filing Date
09-Aug-2024
Registration No
146/2024
Registration Date
09-Aug-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division, Deoni
Judge
1-Cjjd and JMFC Deoni
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
211
Police Station
Police Station Deoni
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.The State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.Santosh Mohan Konale
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary: 146/2024 (Maharashtra v. Santosh Mohan Konale) The court dismissed a criminal case registered under the Maharashtra Liquor Prohibition Act, 1949 (Section 65-E) filed on 07/08/2024, finding no progress in investigation and failure to arraign the accused despite sufficient evidence. The court ordered closure of the case and acquittal of the accused under IPC Section 281, noting that the prosecution's case lacked merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
Cjjd and JMFC Deoni
-
26-Feb-2026
Appearance
Cjjd and JMFC Deoni
-
23-Dec-2025
Appearance
Cjjd and JMFC Deoni
-
30-Oct-2025
Appearance
Cjjd and JMFC Deoni
-
08-Sep-2025
Appearance
Cjjd and JMFC Deoni
-
31-Jul-2025
Appearance
Cjjd and JMFC Deoni
-
26-May-2025
Appearance
Cjjd and JMFC Deoni
-
17-Mar-2025
Appearance
Cjjd and JMFC Deoni
-
21-Dec-2024
Appearance
Cjjd and JMFC Deoni
-
30-Sep-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Aug-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 146/2024
Case Summary: 146/2024 (Maharashtra v. Santosh Mohan Konale) The court dismissed a criminal case registered under the Maharashtra Liquor Prohibition Act, 1949 (Section 65-E) filed on 07/08/2024, finding no progress in investigation and failure to arraign the accused despite sufficient evidence. The court ordered closure of the case and acquittal of the accused under IPC Section 281, noting that the prosecution's case lacked merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts