The State of Maharashtra vs Rahul Chandrakant Biradar and 9 other. — 114/2017
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 188. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHLA160004942017
Filing Number
282/2017
Filing Date
19-09-2017
Registration No
114/2017
Registration Date
19-09-2017
Court
Civil Court Junior Division, Deoni
Judge
1-CJJD and JMFC Deoni
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
180
Police Station
Police Station Deoni
Year
2016
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Rahul Chandrakant Biradar and 9 other.
Amit Shesherao Mankari
Sandeep Shivling Mangalge
Shivkumar Vijaykumar Yedde
Amit Suryakant Saudale
Prashant Kallayanrao Walande
Akash @ Gaurishankar Chandrashakhar Patri
Shivanand Malikarjun Patane
Kiran Vijaykumar Yadde
Cheten @ Prakash Pramod Mitkari
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CJJD and JMFC Deoni
Disposed
N.B.W._Unready
N.B.W._Unready
N.B.W._Unready
N.B.W._Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-02-2026 | N.B.W._Unready |
| 02-01-2026 | N.B.W._Unready |
| 27-11-2025 | N.B.W._Unready |
| 17-10-2025 | N.B.W._Unready |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Rahul Chandrakant Biradar (114/2017) The court disposed of criminal proceedings registered under IPC Section 188 and Maharashtra Police Act Sections 134-135 against respondents (accused 1-10) during a special drive conducted by the High Court. The court found no progress in the investigation, no evidence against the accused, and a possibility of bail being granted; therefore, it closed the case under CrPC Section 281 and discharged the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Rahul Chandrakant Biradar (114/2017) The court disposed of criminal proceedings registered under IPC Section 188 and Maharashtra Police Act Sections 134-135 against respondents (accused 1-10) during a special drive conducted by the High Court. The court found no progress in the investigation, no evidence against the accused, and a possibility of bail being granted; therefore, it closed the case under CrPC Section 281 and discharged the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts