The State of Maharashtra vs Tajmil Gaous Beg Mirza and 3 other. Advocate - Birajdar Uday S — 87/2017
Case under Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act Section 12a. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 13th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHLA160003942017
Filing Number
219/2017
Filing Date
26-07-2017
Registration No
87/2017
Registration Date
26-07-2017
Court
Civil Court Junior Division, Deoni
Judge
1-CJJD and JMFC Deoni
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
112
Police Station
Police Station Deoni
Year
2017
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Tajmil Gaous Beg Mirza and 3 other. Advocate - Birajdar Uday S
Om Balaji Kotwal
Dnyaneshar Rajaram Salunke
Prashant Narayan Tondchire
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CJJD and JMFC Deoni
Disposed
N.B.W._Unready
N.B.W._Unready
N.B.W._Unready
N.B.W._Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-02-2026 | N.B.W._Unready |
| 02-01-2026 | N.B.W._Unready |
| 13-12-2025 | N.B.W._Unready |
| 27-11-2025 | N.B.W._Unready |
Final Orders / Judgements
The High Court of Maharashtra in Case 87/2017 (State of Maharashtra v. Tajmil Gaous Beg Mirza and others) acquitted the respondents of charges under Section 12-A of the Maharashtra Gambling Prohibition Act. The court found that the police investigation was deficient, with no proper evidence or progress in the case since the FIR was registered on 26/07/2017, and determined that the prosecution had failed to establish a credible case. The court ordered the confiscated materials and money to be disposed of according to law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
The High Court of Maharashtra in Case 87/2017 (State of Maharashtra v. Tajmil Gaous Beg Mirza and others) acquitted the respondents of charges under Section 12-A of the Maharashtra Gambling Prohibition Act. The court found that the police investigation was deficient, with no proper evidence or progress in the case since the FIR was registered on 26/07/2017, and determined that the prosecution had failed to establish a credible case. The court ordered the confiscated materials and money to be disposed of according to law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts