The State of Maharashtra vs Shri. Shivdip Krushi Seva Kendra Deoni pro. praa Boyane V.D. Dhanegaonkar and other — 40/2024
Case under Seeds Act Section 19(a),6(a),7(b). Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 13th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHLA160001712024
Filing Number
69/2024
Filing Date
05-03-2024
Registration No
40/2024
Registration Date
05-03-2024
Court
Civil Court Junior Division, Deoni
Judge
1-CJJD and JMFC Deoni
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Shri. Shivdip Krushi Seva Kendra Deoni pro. praa Boyane V.D. Dhanegaonkar and other
M/s Rajureshwar seeds pvt. ltd.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CJJD and JMFC Deoni
Disposed
N.B.W._Unready
B.W._Unready
B.W._Unready
B.W._Unready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-02-2026 | N.B.W._Unready |
| 02-12-2025 | B.W._Unready |
| 13-10-2025 | B.W._Unready |
| 09-09-2025 | B.W._Unready |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court dismissed the criminal case (Case 40/2024) filed by the State of Maharashtra against the respondents under the Indian Penal Code 1966, Sections 19(a)(1), 6(a), 7(b) and the Seeds Act 1968, Section 7. The dismissal was ordered because the accused remained consistently absent from proceedings without proper justification, resulting in no progress in the case, and the court found it appropriate to acquit the accused under CrPC Section 279, as continued prosecution would deny them fair trial rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court dismissed the criminal case (Case 40/2024) filed by the State of Maharashtra against the respondents under the Indian Penal Code 1966, Sections 19(a)(1), 6(a), 7(b) and the Seeds Act 1968, Section 7. The dismissal was ordered because the accused remained consistently absent from proceedings without proper justification, resulting in no progress in the case, and the court found it appropriate to acquit the accused under CrPC Section 279, as continued prosecution would deny them fair trial rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts