The State of Maharashtra vs Rajkumar S/o Shivaji Kamble Advocate - Kamble Dhanaji N_LAPA99 — 27/2018
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 13th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHLA160000982018
Filing Number
51/2018
Filing Date
27-02-2018
Registration No
27/2018
Registration Date
27-02-2018
Court
Civil Court Junior Division, Deoni
Judge
1-CJJD and JMFC Deoni
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
169
Police Station
Police Station Deoni
Year
2017
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Rajkumar S/o Shivaji Kamble Advocate - Kamble Dhanaji N_LAPA99
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CJJD and JMFC Deoni
Disposed
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-02-2026 | Hearing |
| 22-01-2026 | Hearing |
| 05-01-2026 | Hearing |
| 02-12-2025 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Rajkumar S/o Shivaji Kamble Court Decision (13 March 2026): The accused, Rajkumar Shivaji Kamble, was acquitted of charges under Maharashtra Prohibition Act, Section 65(E) for illegal possession and sale of liquor. The court found insufficient prosecution evidence to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt, noting the prosecution failed to properly present all witnesses and relied primarily on chemical analysis reports without adequate corroborating testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Rajkumar S/o Shivaji Kamble Court Decision (13 March 2026): The accused, Rajkumar Shivaji Kamble, was acquitted of charges under Maharashtra Prohibition Act, Section 65(E) for illegal possession and sale of liquor. The court found insufficient prosecution evidence to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt, noting the prosecution failed to properly present all witnesses and relied primarily on chemical analysis reports without adequate corroborating testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts