The State of Maharashtra vs Pradip Vishnu Yashvante and other 1 Advocate - Kulkarni Ashwini P_LAPA — 15/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 303(2), 324(4-5). Status: N.B.W._Ready. Next hearing: 07th July 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHLA160000882026
Next Hearing
07th July 2026
Filing Number
44/2026
Filing Date
06-02-2026
Registration No
15/2026
Registration Date
06-02-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division, Deoni
Judge
1-CJJD and JMFC Deoni
FIR Details
FIR Number
331
Police Station
Police Station Deoni
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Pradip Vishnu Yashvante and other 1 Advocate - Kulkarni Ashwini P_LAPA
Shyam Omkar Jamadar
Adv. Kulkarni Ashwini P_LAPA65
Hearing History
Judge: 1-CJJD and JMFC Deoni
N.B.W._Ready
N.B.W._Ready
N.B.W._Ready
Charge
Charge
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-05-2026 | N.B.W._Ready |
| 20-04-2026 | N.B.W._Ready |
| 13-03-2026 | N.B.W._Ready |
| 10-03-2026 | Charge |
| 02-03-2026 | Charge |
Interim Orders
Case Summary (RCC No. 15-2026): Bail application allowed. Accused Nos. 1 and 2, charged under Sections 303(2), 324(4), 324(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and in custody since 31/12/2025, were granted bail. The court found investigation complete, custody unnecessary, and offences carry punishment below seven years. Each accused must execute personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with equivalent surety, remain present in court proceedings, and refrain from pressurizing witnesses or tampering evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary (RCC No. 15-2026): Bail application allowed. Accused Nos. 1 and 2, charged under Sections 303(2), 324(4), 324(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and in custody since 31/12/2025, were granted bail. The court found investigation complete, custody unnecessary, and offences carry punishment below seven years. Each accused must execute personal bond of Rs. 25,000 with equivalent surety, remain present in court proceedings, and refrain from pressurizing witnesses or tampering evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts